Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39538038›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2025

CAR-engineered NK cells versus CAR T cells in treatment of glioblastoma; strength and flaws.

Mohammadmahdi Sabahi, Ali Fathi Jouzdani, Zohre Sadeghian, Mohammad Amin Dabbagh Ohadi, Hadi Sultan, Arash Salehipour, Lana Maniakhina, Nima Rezaei, Badih Adada, Alireza Mansouri and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Medulloblastoma: biology and immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Nanomedicine for Glioblastoma Therapy: Novel Insights and Future Perspectives.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohammadmahdi SabahiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Pauline Braathen Neurological Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
Ali Fathi JouzdaniNeurosurgery Research Group (NRG), Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Zohre SadeghianDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
Mohammad Amin Dabbagh OhadiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hadi SultanCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Arash SalehipourNeurosurgery Research Group (NRG), Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Lana ManiakhinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Geisinger and Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA.
Nima RezaeiNetwork of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran.
Badih AdadaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Pauline Braathen Neurological Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
Alireza MansouriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA. amansouri@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
Hamid Borghei-RazaviDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Pauline Braathen Neurological Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive primary brain tumor that carries a grim prognosis. Because of the dearth of treatment options available for treatment of GBM, Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-engineered T cell and Natural Killer (NK) therapy could provide alternative strategies to address the challenges in GBM treatment. In these approaches, CAR T and NK cells are engineered for cancer-specific immunotherapy by recognizing surface antigens independently of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. However, the efficacy of CAR T cells is hindered by GBM's downregulation of its targeted antigens. CAR NK cells face similar challenges, but, in contrast, they offer advantages as off-the-shelf allogeneic products, devoid of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) risk as well as anti-cancer activity beyond CAR specificity, potentially reducing the risk of relapse or resistance. Despite CAR T cell therapies being extensively studied in clinical settings, the use of CAR-modified NK cells in GBM treatment remains largely in the preclinical stage. This review aims to discuss recent advancements in NK cell and CAR T cell therapies for GBM, including methods for introducing CARs into both NK cells and T cells, addressing manufacturing challenges, and providing evidence supporting the efficacy of these approaches from preclinical and early-phase clinical studies. The comprehensive evaluation of CAR-engineered NK cells and CAR T cells seeks to identify the optimal therapeutic approach for GBM, contributing to the development of effective immunotherapies for this devastating disease.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaImmunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAntigen specificityCAR T cellsGlioblastomaImmunotherapyNK cellsPreclinical studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.