ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
Phase Ib study of the oral PI3Kδ inhibitor linperlisib in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting PI3Kδ for lymphoma and immune diseases treatment: a review.Molecular diversity · 2026Review
- A renaissance in targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Low-Dose Linperlisib Achieves Rapid Hematological Response in a Patient with Pure Red Cell Aplasia and Moderate-to-Severe Renal Insufficiency: A Case ReportTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2026Article
- From the gene to the clinic: Key milestones in the PI3Kδ journey.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2026Review
- The PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway: Immuno-Metabolic Orchestration in IR/MASH-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of biological sciences · 2025Review
- Targeting PI3K family with small-molecule inhibitors in cancer therapy: current clinical status and future directions.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with advanced solid tumors have a suboptimal prognosis. This study investigated the safety and feasibility of linperlisib, a selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase delta isoform (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, for treating patients with advanced solid tumors.
methodsIn this phase Ib, single-arm, open-label, multi-center clinical trial, patients with histologically confirmed advanced solid tumors from eight centers in China were enrolled to receive oral linperlisib (80 mg/day). The primary endpoint was safety.
resultsBetween August 2019 and June 2022, 94 patients were enrolled in the trial and received the study treatment. The most common (≥ 20%) treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of all grades irrespective of causality were increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (26.6%), proteinuria (26.6%), decreased appetite (25.5%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (22.3%), weight loss (21.3%), and anemia (21.3%). The most common grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were diarrhea (4.3%), increased AST (3.2%), increased ALT (3.2%), neutropenia (3.2%), anemia (3.2%), increased blood alkaline phosphatase (3.2%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 1.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0-5.8), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 37.2% (95% CI 27.5-47.8). As of the data cutoff, the median follow-up time was 4.2 months (95% CI 2.8-6.9). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.85 months (95% CI 1.79-1.88). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached.
conclusionLinperlisib showed an acceptable safety profile and preliminary clinical benefit in patients with a range of advanced solid tumors. Further studies of linperlisib safety and efficacy are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.