Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537988›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

Machine learning for early dynamic prediction of functional outcome after stroke.

Julian Klug, Guillaume Leclerc, Elisabeth Dirren, Emmanuel Carrera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian KlugStroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4849-9811
Guillaume LeclercDepartment of Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Elisabeth DirrenStroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Emmanuel CarreraStroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland. emmanuel.carrera@hcuge.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-5382

Funding

Schweizerische Herzstiftung (Swiss Heart Foundation) FF 18071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrediction of outcome after stroke is critical for treatment planning and resource allocation but is complicated by fluctuations during the first days after onset. We propose a machine learning model that can provide hourly predictions based on the integration of continuous variables acquired within 72 h of hospital admission.

methodsWe analyzed 2492 admissions for ischemic stroke in the Geneva University Hospital from 01.01.2018 to 31.12.2021, amounting to 2'131'752 unique data points. We developed a transformer model that continuously included clinical, physiological, imaging, and biological data recorded within 72 h of admission. This model was trained to generate hourly predictions of mortality and morbidity. Shapley additive explanations were used to identify the most relevant predictors to explain outcomes for each patient. The MIMIC-III database was used for external validation.

resultsOur transformer model predicts mortality, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.830 (95% CI 0.763-0.885) on admission, reaching 0.893 (95% CI 0.839-0.933) 72 h later for a 3-month outcome. Validated in an independent cohort, it outperforms all static models. Based on their mean explanatory weights, the top predictors included continuous clinical evaluation, baseline patient characteristics, timing from admission to acute treatment, and markers of inflammation and organ dysfunction.

conclusionsThe performance of our transformer model demonstrates the potential of machine learning models integrating clinical, physiological, imaging, and biological variables over time after stroke. The clinical applicability of our model is further strengthened by access to hourly updated predictions along with accompanying explanations.

Identifiers

PMID39537988
PMCPMC11561255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.