ArticleScientific reports2024
Use of short single-balloon enteroscopy in patients with surgically altered anatomy: a single-center experience.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional duodenoscopy is challenging to perform in patients with a surgically altered anatomy (SAA). Short single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) is an innovative alternative. We investigated the performance of short SBE in patients with SAA and explored risk factors for unsuccessful intubation. Patients who underwent short SBE from October 2019 to October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Successful enteroscopic intubation was defined as the endoscope reaching the papilla of Vater, the pancreaticobiliary-enteric anastomosis, or the target site of the afferent limb. In total, 99 short SBE procedures were performed in 64 patients (40 men, 24 women) with a mean age of 61 years (range, 36-86 years). The patients had a history of choledochoduodenostomy (n = 1), Billroth II gastrojejunostomy (n = 11), pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 17), Roux-en-Y reconstruction with hepaticojejunostomy (n = 31), and Roux-en-Y reconstruction with total gastrectomy (n = 4). Successful enteroscopic intubation occurred in 32 of 64 (50.0%) patients, and in 57 of 99 (57.6%) procedures. No perforation or severe pancreatitis occurred. Multivariable analysis showed that Roux-en-Y reconstruction was a risk factor for intubation failure (hazard ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-15.8; p = 0.033). Short SBE is efficacious and safe in patients with postsurgical anatomy. Roux-en-Y reconstruction adversely affects the success of short SBE intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.