ArticleEndocrine2025
Assessment of the frequency and risk factors for colorectal cancer in acromegaly.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acromegaly complications: an update.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- A risk assessment model for colon cancer and precancerous lesions based on cancer screening and external validation of the NHANES database.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcromegaly is associated with a possible increased risk of neoplasias, like colorectal cancer (CRC), although magnitude of this risk is unclear.
objectivesEvaluate frequency of colonic adenomatous polyps and CRC in patients with acromegaly at first and subsequent colonoscopies; correlate risk factors of CRC and disease activity of acromegaly with colonoscopy findings and analyze relationship of acromegaly as a risk factor for CRC and the best period for screening this neoplasia.
methodsPatients ≥18 years-old with acromegaly were included. A questionnaire involving characteristics of follow-up of acromegaly and risk factors of CRC was created. Biochemical and colonoscopic data were collected through medical records. Only full-length colonoscopies with satisfactory colonic preparation were included.
results123 patients (77 women) were included (mean age at diagnosis of 43.1 years and mean follow-up of 13.7 years). In baseline colonoscopy, 80.5% had non-neoplastic findings, 14.6% non-advanced adenomas, 3.3% advanced adenomas and 1.6% CRC. At end of the study, 3 (2.4%) patients were diagnosed with CRC. No patient under 50 years had a neoplastic lesion on colonoscopy. We observed a positive statistically significant relationship between smoking (p = 0.026), age at diagnosis of acromegaly (p < 0.001), age at baseline colonoscopy (p = 0.002), and risk of adenomas and/or CRC at initial colonoscopy.
conclusionsSmoking and advanced age were positively related to a higher risk of developing premalignant/malignant colonic lesions. Age ( > 50 years) was the most robust variable. Our data suggest that screening age for CRC in acromegaly should be reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39537960What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.