ArticleLasers in medical science2024
Comparison of the effects of laser systems and cold atmospheric plasma on the surface roughness and shear bond strength of flexible hybrid ceramics.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Piezoelectric cold atmospheric plasma modulates neurogenic cell proliferation and differentiation via cross-signaling.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of laser systems and cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) on the surface roughness (Ra) and shear bond strength (SBS) of flexible hybrid ceramics (FHCs). Eighty FHC samples were divided into 5 groups to be subjected to surface treatments (hydrofluoric acid (HFA), HFA + 5 W Er: YAG laser (HFA + 5WE), HFA + 3 W Er: YAG laser (HFA + 3WE), HFA + ultrafast fiber laser (HFA + FL), and CAP). The Er: YAG laser (AT Fidelis Plus III, Fotona, Slovenia) was operated with a 0.9 mm diameter tip, delivering 250 mJ and 150 mJ per pulse, with output powers of 5 W and 3 W, and fluences of 23,623 J/cm² and 14,157 J/cm², respectively, at a frequency of 20 Hz and a pulse duration of 600 µs for 30 s. The FL (FiberLAST Inc., Turkey) was applied with a 7 mm spot size, 1 mJ pulse energy, 20 W output power, 100 kHz repetition rate, ultrashort pulse length (100 ns), and the fluence of 1,820 J/cm² for 7 s. The CAP (PiezoBrush PZ3, Relyon Plasma, Germany) applied to the surfaces for 80 s at a treatment speed of 5 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
39537949What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.