Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537767›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2025

The abscopal effects of sonodynamic therapy in cancer.

Victoria G Collins, Dana Hutton, Kismet Hossain-Ibrahim, James Joseph, Sourav Banerjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ultrasound-activated CuJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A Self-Immunoregulatory Nanosensitizer for Sonodynamic Cancer Therapy.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Targeting Lysosomes for Enhanced Anti-Cancer Therapeutics and Immune Response.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Focused Ultrasound for Sarcomas: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victoria G CollinsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
Dana HuttonThe Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Kismet Hossain-IbrahimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
James JosephDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. JJoseph001@dundee.ac.uk.
Sourav BanerjeeDivision of Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. s.y.banerjee@dundee.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2043-2989

Funding

Academy of Medical Sciences SBF007\100007Royal Society RGS/R1/231377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The abscopal effect is a phenomenon wherein localised therapy on the primary tumour leads to regression of distal metastatic growths. Interestingly, various pre-clinical studies utilising sonodynamic therapy (SDT) have reported significant abscopal effects, however, the mechanism remains largely enigmatic. SDT is an emerging non-invasive cancer treatment that uses focussed ultrasound (FUS) and a sonosensitiser to induce tumour cell death. To expand our understanding of abscopal effects of SDT, we have summarised the preclinical studies that have found SDT-induced abscopal responses across various cancer models, using diverse combination strategies with nanomaterials, microbubbles, chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Additionally, we shed light on the molecular and immunological mechanisms underpinning SDT-induced primary and metastatic tumour cell death, as well as the role and efficacy of different sonosensitisers. Notably, the observed abscopal effects underscore the need for continued investigation into the SDT-induced 'vaccine-effect' as a potential strategy for enhancing systemic anti-tumour immunity and combating metastatic disease. The results of the first SDT human clinical trials are much awaited and are hoped to enable the further evaluation of the safety and efficacy of SDT, paving the way for future studies specifically designed to explore the potential of translating SDT-induced abscopal effects into clinical reality.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsUltrasonic TherapyAnimalsCombined Modality TherapyHumans

Identifiers

PMID39537767
PMCPMC11876350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.