ArticleScientific reports2024
Analysis of influential factors of stent-related adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention more than twice: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of the message-framed exercise rehabilitation education program for post-PCI patients: a study protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to assess the factors affecting patient outcomes in multiple stent placements over a 10-year period. The single-center study included 1,200 patients who had multiple stents implanted at least twice or more. Participants were divided into the adverse outcomes as endpoints (n = 204 [17%]) and control groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses of stent-related adverse events risk during 10 years and logistic regression analysis of the adverse outcomes risk factors were performed. Univariate analysis revealed the impact of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), diabetes mellitus, hypertriglyceridemia, cumulative lesions in the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries, number of stents in the LAD, LCX, and right coronary artery (RCA), presence of multiple coronary artery lesions, total number of stents used, and intervals between the first and second and between the fourth and fifth implantations. For secondary stent implantation, significant factors in univariate analysis included the number of LAD and LCX lesions, stents in LAD, LCX, and RCA, extent of coronary lesions, ACS, hypertension, diabetes, and total stent count. Many factors affect the outcomes in this patient group over time. Reducing the need for frequent percutaneous coronary intervention and considering the number of stents implanted are essential to improving outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.