Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537717›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Validation of computer vision-based ergonomic risk assessment tools for real manufacturing environments.

Thomas Agostinelli, Andrea Generosi, Silvia Ceccacci, Maura Mengoni

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Transformation of Epidemiology in the Age of Artificial Intelligence].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas AgostinelliDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, via Brecce Bianche, 12, Ancona, 60131, AN, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3134-7747
Andrea GenerosiDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, via Brecce Bianche, 12, Ancona, 60131, AN, Italy. a.generosi@univpm.it.ORCID 0000-0001-6173-9616
Silvia CeccacciDepartment of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Università degli Studi di Macerata, via Luigi Bertelli, 1, Macerata, 62100, MC, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8916-1262
Maura MengoniDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, via Brecce Bianche, 12, Ancona, 60131, AN, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2826-7455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study contributes to understanding semi-automated ergonomic risk assessments in industrial manufacturing environments, proposing a practical tool for enhancing worker safety and operational efficiency. In the Industry 5.0 era, the human-centric approach in manufacturing is crucial, especially considering the aging workforce and the dynamic nature of the entire modern industrial sector, today integrating digital technology, automation, and sustainable practices to enhance productivity and environmental responsibility. This approach aims to adapt work conditions to individual capabilities, addressing the high incidence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The traditional, subjective methods of ergonomic assessment are inadequate for dynamic settings, highlighting the need for affordable, automatic tools for continuous monitoring of workers' postures to evaluate ergonomic risks effectively during tasks. To enable this perspective, 2D RGB Motion Capture (MoCap) systems based on computer vision currently seem the technologies of choice, given their low intrusiveness, cost, and implementation effort. However, the reliability and applicability of these systems in the dynamic and varied manufacturing environment remain uncertain. This research benchmarks various literature proposed MoCap tools and examines the viability of MoCap systems for ergonomic risk assessments in Industry 5.0 by exploiting one of the benchmarked semi-automated, low-cost and non-intrusive 2D RGB MoCap system, capable of continuously monitoring and analysing workers' postures. By conducting experiments across varied manufacturing environments, this research evaluates the system's effectiveness in assessing ergonomic risks and its adaptability to different production lines. Results reveal that the accuracy of risk assessments varies by specific environmental conditions and workstation setups. Although these systems are not yet optimized for expert-level risk certification, they offer significant potential for enhancing workplace safety and efficiency by providing continuous posture monitoring. Future improvements could explore advanced computational techniques like machine learning to refine ergonomic assessments further.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsPostureAdultHumansMaleManufacturing IndustryMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational DiseasesOccupational HealthRisk AssessmentWorkplaceComputer visionDeep learningErgonomic monitoringErgonomic Risk AssessmentMotion captureWork-related MSDs

Identifiers

PMID39537717
PMCPMC11561082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.