Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537716›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Laminar and turbulent flow effects in high-pressure homogenization of liposomes and perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions.

Larissa J Lubitz, Harden Rieger, Gero Leneweit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Larissa J LubitzABNOBA GmbH, 75223, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany.
Harden RiegerABNOBA GmbH, 75223, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany.
Gero LeneweitABNOBA GmbH, 75223, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany. gero.leneweit2@kit.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since flow characteristics are still largely unexplored for high-pressure homogenization, we investigated particle break-up at different Reynolds numbers and transition ranges in two channels (Y- and Z-channel). While the channel geometries are often treated as "black boxes", opening the channels and measuring their geometries allowed a detailed analysis of flow conditions. Transitions from laminar to turbulent flow for pressures of 250-2,000 bar have measurable effects on the sizes of perfluorocarbon (PFC)-nanoemulsion droplets emulsified by phospholipids processed simultaneously in liposomal conformation. Laminar flow has a higher size-reducing rate with growing pressure compared to turbulent flow and leads to a minimum in polydispersity. A density-driven sucrose gradient allows differential analysis of size-reducing effects on liposomes and PFC-nanoemulsion droplets separately. Liposomes can be broken up in both laminar and turbulent flow at the same size reduction rate. In contrast, emulsion droplets have much smaller size reduction rates in turbulent flow and need sufficient emulsifiers, made available by liposomal break-up, to enable size decreases. Repetitive homogenization is only effective for a limited number of cycles. Beyond this threshold, size distributions remain similar or can be deteriorated because of increased particle collisions and aggregation or coalescence effects.

Identifiers

PMID39537716
PMCPMC11561284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.