Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537713›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

3D limb dynamics of flyball dogs turning on different box angles.

Scott Blake, Roberta Blake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scott BlakeHartpury University, Hartpury, Gloucester, GL19 3BE, UK.
Roberta BlakeAnglia Ruskin University, Lordship Road, Chelmsford, CM1 3RR, UK. roberta.blake@aru.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0037-5286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are no regulations for the flyball box angulation, which ranges from 45° to 89°. As such at present, the box turn is deemed to represent the greatest injury risk to competitors. The aim of this study was to understand the influence of box angle on kinematic variables during a flyball turn, by comparing dogs turning on three different angulations of flyball box (45°, 60° and 83°) to allow for recommendations to be made regarding the most appropriate box design in terms of limiting risk of injury across the sport, to increase both wellbeing and safety for competitors. Turning on a 45° box generates significantly more flexion in the forelimbs and carpus, whereas turning on an 83° box generates greater degrees of extension in the elbow, shoulder, hock and stifle. What our 3D analysis has shown is that the relationship between box angle and the physical demands placed on the dog are complex, and related mainly to asymmetrical nature of the sport, and as such no one angle may be more or less suitable for training and competition, but the 60° seems to be a mid-ground, whereas direction of turn may be fundamental in generating the potential for injury.

Indexed as

ForelimbAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBoxingDogsBiomechanicsCanineSport dogs

Identifiers

PMID39537713
PMCPMC11561069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.