ArticleScientific reports2024
Nonnegative matrix factorization for analyzing state dependent neuronal network dynamics in calcium recordings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disentangling Stimulus & Population Dynamics in Mouse V1: Orthogonal Subspace Decomposition for Neural Representation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Calcium Dynamics in Astrocyte-Neuron Communication from Intracellular to Extracellular Signaling.Cells · 2025Review
- Neurophotonics beyond the surface: unmasking the brain's complexity exploiting optical scattering.Neurophotonics · 2024Article
- Advanced Techniques for Liver Fibrosis Detection: Spectral Photoacoustic Imaging and Superpixel Photoacoustic Unmixing Analysis for Collagen Tracking.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Neurophotonics beyond the Surface: Unmasking the Brain's Complexity Exploiting Optical Scattering.ArXiv · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Calcium imaging allows recording from hundreds of neurons in vivo with the ability to resolve single cell activity. Evaluating and analyzing neuronal responses, while also considering all dimensions of the data set to make specific conclusions, is extremely difficult. Often, descriptive statistics are used to analyze these forms of data. These analyses, however, remove variance by averaging the responses of single neurons across recording sessions, or across combinations of neurons, to create single quantitative metrics, losing the temporal dynamics of neuronal activity, and their responses relative to each other. Dimensionally Reduction (DR) methods serve as a good foundation for these analyses because they reduce the dimensions of the data into components, while still maintaining the variance. Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF) is an especially promising DR analysis method for analyzing activity recorded in calcium imaging because of its mathematical constraints, which include positivity and linearity. We adapt NMF for our analyses and compare its performance to alternative dimensionality reduction methods on both artificial and in vivo data. We find that NMF is well-suited for analyzing calcium imaging recordings, accurately capturing the underlying dynamics of the data, and outperforming alternative methods in common use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.