ArticleScientific reports2024
Deep learning of structural MRI predicts fluid, crystallized, and general intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating the fraction of variance of crystallized intelligence explained by cortical surface area in early adolescence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Whole brain grey matter synaptic terminal density, age and intellectual functioning in schizophrenia: an in vivo [Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Predicting Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Response Using an AI-Based Tumor Vessel Biomarker.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Can brain structure predict human intelligence? T1-weighted structural brain magnetic resonance images (sMRI) have been correlated with intelligence. However, the population-level association does not fully account for individual variability in intelligence. To address this, studies have emerged recently to predict individual subject's intelligence or neurocognitive scores. However, they are mostly on predicting fluid intelligence (the ability to solve new problems). Studies are lacking to predict crystallized intelligence (the ability to accumulate knowledge) or general intelligence (fluid and crystallized intelligence combined). This study tests whether deep learning of sMRI can predict an individual subject's verbal, comprehensive, and full-scale intelligence quotients (VIQ, PIQ, and FSIQ), which reflect fluid and crystallized intelligence. We performed a comprehensive set of 432 experiments, using different input image channels, six deep learning models, and two outcome settings, in 850 healthy and autistic subjects 6-64 years of age. Our findings indicate a statistically significant potential of T1-weighted sMRI in predicting intelligence, with a Pearson correlation exceeding 0.21 (p < 0.001). Interestingly, we observed that an increase in the complexity of deep learning models does not necessarily translate to higher accuracy in intelligence prediction. The interpretations of our 2D and 3D CNNs, based on GradCAM, align well with the Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT), reinforcing the theory's suggestion that human intelligence is a result of interactions among various brain regions, including the occipital, temporal, parietal, and frontal lobes. These promising results invite further studies and open new questions in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.