Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537706›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Deep learning of structural MRI predicts fluid, crystallized, and general intelligence.

Mohammad Arafat Hussain, Danielle LaMay, Ellen Grant, Yangming Ou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Whole brain grey matter synaptic terminal density, age and intellectual functioning in schizophrenia: an in vivo [Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad Arafat HussainDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Danielle LaMayDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Ellen GrantDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Yangming OuDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. yangming.ou@childrens.harvard.edu.

Funding

Consortium Of MRI Biomarkers In Neonatal Encephalopathy (COMBINE)R61NS126792 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI COTTEN, CHARLES MICHAEL, GRANT, PATRICIA ELLEN · 2022 to 2024
$2.7M
Consortium Of MRI Biomarkers In Neonatal Encephalopathy (COMBINE)R33NS126792 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES Michael COTTEN, Patricia Ellen Grant · 2025 to 2026
$1.8M
Multi-site Data for Nutrition Studies in Healthy Early ChildhoodR03HD107124 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI OU, YANGMING · 2022 to 2023
$177k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD107124NINDS NIH HHS R33 NS126792NINDS NIH HHS R61 NS126792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can brain structure predict human intelligence? T1-weighted structural brain magnetic resonance images (sMRI) have been correlated with intelligence. However, the population-level association does not fully account for individual variability in intelligence. To address this, studies have emerged recently to predict individual subject's intelligence or neurocognitive scores. However, they are mostly on predicting fluid intelligence (the ability to solve new problems). Studies are lacking to predict crystallized intelligence (the ability to accumulate knowledge) or general intelligence (fluid and crystallized intelligence combined). This study tests whether deep learning of sMRI can predict an individual subject's verbal, comprehensive, and full-scale intelligence quotients (VIQ, PIQ, and FSIQ), which reflect fluid and crystallized intelligence. We performed a comprehensive set of 432 experiments, using different input image channels, six deep learning models, and two outcome settings, in 850 healthy and autistic subjects 6-64 years of age. Our findings indicate a statistically significant potential of T1-weighted sMRI in predicting intelligence, with a Pearson correlation exceeding 0.21 (p < 0.001). Interestingly, we observed that an increase in the complexity of deep learning models does not necessarily translate to higher accuracy in intelligence prediction. The interpretations of our 2D and 3D CNNs, based on GradCAM, align well with the Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT), reinforcing the theory's suggestion that human intelligence is a result of interactions among various brain regions, including the occipital, temporal, parietal, and frontal lobes. These promising results invite further studies and open new questions in the field.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningIntelligenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAutistic DisorderChildFemaleHumansIntelligence TestsMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultCNNDeep neural networkIntelligenceIQNeurocognition

Identifiers

PMID39537706
PMCPMC11561325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.