Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537699›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The disappearing COVID-Naïve Population and comparative Roche vs. Abbott Test sensitivity: evidence from antibody seroprevalence in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin.

Lorenzo Franchi, Vladimir Atanasov, Mark Stake, Garrett Bates, Kristen Osinski, John R Meurer, Bernard Black

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lorenzo FranchiNorthwestern Pritzker School of Law, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Vladimir AtanasovWilliam & Mary, Mason School of Business, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA.
Mark StakeMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Garrett BatesMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Kristen OsinskiMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
John R MeurerMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Bernard BlackNorthwestern Pritzker School of Law, Chicago, Illinois, USA. bblack@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001436 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FREED, JULIE K · 2015 to 2025
$47.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001436NIH HHS 3 UL1 TR001436-06S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a diverse population in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin from May 2021 to June 2022. We find that 99.4% (523/526) of the participants had positive results for antibodies to the SARS CoV2 spike protein over April-June 2022, soon after the early-2022 Omicron surge. Positive tests for spike protein antibodies were very high (86%; 19/22) even among unvaccinated persons who reported no knowledge of prior infection. Thus, by mid-2022, almost all persons were no longer COVID-naïve, defined as vaccination, infection (often without symptoms), or both. Nucleocapsid antibody tests, especially the Abbott test, were far less sensitive than spike protein tests, and Abbott test sensitivity faded with time since infection. Thus, studies which rely on nucleocapsid tests will understate prior infection rates. We also report large sample evidence on the performance of the Abbott and Roche spike and nucleocapsid protein tests in capturing prior vaccination, infection, or both. The Roche spike protein test outperforms the Abbott spike test, and the Roche nucleocapsid test greatly outperforms the Abbott nucleocapsid test.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19 Serological TestingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ViralSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Abbott antibodies testAntibodiesCOVID-19InfectionNucleocapsid testRoche antibodies testSARS-CoV-2Spike testVaccines

Identifiers

PMID39537699
PMCPMC11561140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.