ArticleScientific reports2024
Complexity AF score as a novel marker of atrial fibrillation instability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- (Cardiac) complexity needs interaction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a heart disease affecting millions of Americans. Clinicians evaluate AF-related risk by assessing the temporal pattern, variation, and severity of AF episodes through AF burden (AFB). However, existing prognostic tools based on these metrics are suboptimal, as they do not account for electrical complexity of AF signals. This study introduced Electrical Burden (EB) as a new marker to assess electrical instability and complexity of AF. We also developed a Complexity AF score that incorporates AFB, EB, and Poincaré analysis to assess the severity of AF. Electrocardiogram (ECG) from 50 AF patients in the Long-term AF database were analyzed. EB was calculated using four metrics and combined with AFB and Poincaré metrics to derive the Complexity AF score for each patient. Our results show that AFB, EB, and Poincaré metrics are independent markers, each describing different aspects of AF complexity. The Complexity AF score effectively distinguished between terminated (2.82 ± 1.29, 17 patients) and non-terminated AF groups (4 ± 1.46, 33 patients) (p-value < 0.05). This study emphasizes the importance of EB and Poincaré analysis as an indicator of electrical complexity of AF and highlights the utility of the Complexity AF score in accurately characterizing and stratifying AF to guide management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.