ArticleNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2024
Not only for corals: exploring the uptake of beneficial microorganisms for corals by sponges.
Article in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trophic Antioxidant Transfer as a Measure for Scalable Coral Conservation Strategies.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Too hot for my bugs: mediterranean heatwave disrupts associated microbiomes in the sponge Petrosia ficiformis.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- The Coral Probiotics Village: An Underwater Laboratory to Tackle the Coral Reefs Crisis.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Charting a path for microbial conservation in the IUCN: report on "Conservation in a Microbial World" meeting in San Diego, CA, May 2025.Sustainable microbiology · 2025Article
- Coral probiotics induce tissue-specific and putative beneficial microbiome restructuring in a coral-dwelling fish.ISME communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiome restoration using beneficial microorganisms for corals (BMCs) comprise a promising strategy to help corals cope with anthropogenic stressors. However, there is limited knowledge on the uptake of BMCs by nontarget animals, especially sponges. This study explores whether sponges can acquire BMCs upon direct application and whether inoculations affect sponge health. A 4-week field experiment applying BMCs to Stylissa carteri and Callyspongia crassa assessed three conditions: no inoculation, and BMCs inoculation once and thrice a week. BMC-related strains were naturally present in the seawater and the microbiome of S. carteri. These strains were enriched in response to the inoculation only in the S. carteri microbiome. Microbiomes of both sponges were restructured; sponges were visually healthy and efficiently pumped water at the end of the experiment. These results suggest that sponges can be enriched with BMC-related strains, and that BMC application on nearby corals is unlikely to negatively affect sponge health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.