Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537578›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2025

Revalidation of Enteromius karkensis (Gilchrist and Thompson 1913) (Cypriniformes: Smiliogastrinae) from the southern temperate freshwater ecoregion, South Africa.

Melissa B Martin, Albert Chakona, Wilbert T Kadye, Martinus Scheepers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa B MartinNational Research Foundation - South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, South Africa.
Albert ChakonaNational Research Foundation - South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, South Africa.
Wilbert T KadyeNational Research Foundation - South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, South Africa.
Martinus ScheepersNational Research Foundation - South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Makhanda, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5790-5167

Funding

NRF-FBIP Biodiversity surveys in priority inland areas IBIP-BS13100251309NRF-FBIP REFRESH project FBIP-211006643719NRF-FBIP Topotypes project IBIP-BS 13100251309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chubbyhead barbs, a distinct group of fishes endemic to southern Africa, currently include eight valid species. Historically, Enteromius anoplus was the most widespread freshwater fish in South Africa due to synonymizations in the 1960s. It occurred in nearly every river system except coastal systems in the Cape Fold Ecoregion and the lower Orange River. However, a recent revision utilizing molecular and morphological analyses has led to significant taxonomic updates. Enteromius anoplus is restricted to the Gouritz River system, whereas Enteromius cernuus and Enteromius oraniensis have been revalidated and respectively confined to the Olifants and Orange River systems. Additionally, a new species Enteromius mandelai was described, with its range currently considered to encompass several river systems in the Eastern Cape. Despite these advances, the taxonomic status of fish previously assigned to E. anoplus from KwaZulu-Natal remained uncertain. In this study, an integrative approach, combining genetic analysis, morphological characteristics, and geographic data, was employed to resurrect Enteromius karkensis as a distinct species from E. anoplus. Enteromius karkensis is deeply genetically differentiated (3.99%-8.07% p-distance) from its congeners within the chubbyhead group. Morphologically, E. karkensis is easily distinguishable from its counterparts due to possession of a terminal mouth (vs. inferior in E. amatolicus), one pair of maxillary barbels (vs. two conspicuous pairs in E. motebensis, E. treurensis, and E. gurneyi), and a complete lateral line (vs. incomplete in E. anoplus and E. oraniensis). Furthermore, E. karkensis is differentiated from E. mandelai and E. cernuus by its long maxillary barbels that extend beyond the midpoint of the orbit. These findings highlight a consistent pattern from previous studies that show many freshwater fishes in South Africa have narrow geographic ranges. This emphasizes the importance of targeted conservation and management efforts, and our understanding of the biogeographic and evolutionary history of freshwater fishes in southern Africa.

Indexed as

CypriniformesAnimalsFresh WaterPhylogenyRiversSouth AfricaCOI sequencesEastern Cape ProvinceEnteromiussouthern AfricauMngeni river system

Identifiers

PMID39537578
PMCPMC11949742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.