Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537556›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2024

Participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program by people with severe mental illness, Australia, 2006-2019: a national data linkage study.

Steve Kisely, Rebecca Seth, Susan J Jordan, Bradley Kendall, Dan J Siskind, Grant Sara, Justin Chapman, Lisa Brophy, David M Lawrence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. The experiences of people diagnosed with severe mental illness and colorectal cancer: A qualitative study.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steve KiselyThe University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.ORCID 0000-0003-4021-2924
Rebecca SethCurtin University, Perth, WA.
Susan J JordanThe University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.ORCID 0000-0002-4566-1414
Bradley KendallThe University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.
Dan J SiskindThe University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.
Grant SaraThe University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.ORCID 0000-0002-3762-1711
Justin ChapmanMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, QLD.
Lisa BrophyLa Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC.
David M LawrenceCurtin University, Perth, WA.ORCID 0000-0003-4700-1425

Funding

Cancer Australia APP1157870National Health and Medical Research Council GNT11111136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare rates of participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) and follow-up for people with severe mental illness with those for people without severe mental illness or not prescribed antidepressants. STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study; analysis of de-identified linked NBCSP, Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), and Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) data.

settingAustralia, 2006-2019.

participantsPeople aged 50-74 years (NBCSP-eligible) with severe mental illness, defined as those dispensed two or more prescriptions for second generation antipsychotics or for lithium (PBS data), and a random sample of people aged 50-74 years eligible for Medicare-subsidised services but never prescribed psychotropic medications (antipsychotics, lithium, antidepressants).

main outcome measuresNBCSP participation (returned faecal occult blood test sample), valid test result, positive test result, and follow-up colonoscopy rates.

resultsA total of 119 475 people with severe mental illness and 1 090 574 control group people were included in our analyses. The proportion of women was larger in the severe mental illness group (51.3%) than the control group (48.7%), as were the proportions who lived in inner regional areas (23.5% v 19.1%) or in areas in the lowest socio-economic quintile (21.8% v 14.7%). The NBCSP participation rate was lower among people with severe mental illness (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.84). The proportion of valid test results was smaller for people with severe mental illness (95.9% v 98.7%; adjusted IRR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99), and the positive test result proportion larger (12.3% v 6.6%; adjusted IRR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.94-2.09). The proportion of positive test results followed by colonoscopy was smaller for people with severe mental illness (71.7% v 82.6%; adjusted IRR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.92).

conclusionsPeople with severe mental illness were less likely to participate in the NBCSP or to undergo colonoscopy after a positive test result than other Australians. These differences may contribute to higher colorectal cancer mortality among people with severe mental illness. The contributions of differences in cancer stage at diagnosis and subsequent treatment to higher colorectal cancer mortality require further study.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMental DisordersAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult BloodRetrospective StudiesBipolar and related disordersColorectal neoplasmsEarly detection of cancerEpidemiologyPsychotic disordersSchizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID39537556
PMCPMC11625528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.