Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537329›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2024

Safety of inpatient care in surgical settings: cohort study.

Antoine Duclos, Michelle L Frits, Christine Iannaccone, Stuart R Lipsitz, Zara Cooper, Joel S Weissman, David W Bates

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07621198 (Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Major Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07621198 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Prediction of Postoperative Complications in Major Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study in Low- and Middle-income Settings

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Departamental de VillavicencioRan2026 to 2027Enrolled364ConditionsMajor SurgeryArmsPatients with postoperative complications
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antoine DuclosCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02120, USA antoineduclos@yahoo.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-8915-4203
Michelle L FritsCenter for Patient Safety, Research and Practice, Division of General and Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Christine IannacconeCenter for Patient Safety, Research and Practice, Division of General and Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Stuart R LipsitzCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
Zara CooperCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
Joel S WeissmanCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
David W BatesCenter for Patient Safety, Research and Practice, Division of General and Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the frequency, severity, and preventability of adverse events associated with perioperative care, and to describe the setting and professions concerned.

designMulticenter retrospective cohort study.

setting11 US hospitals.

participants1009 patients from a randomly selected sample of 64 121 adults admitted for surgery during 2018.

main outcome measuresAdverse events during inpatient perioperative care were assessed using a trigger method, identifying information previously associated with similar events, and from a comprehensive review of electronic health records. Trained nurses reviewed all records and flagged admissions with possible adverse events, which were then adjudicated by physicians, who confirmed the occurrence and characteristics of the events. Adverse events were classified as major if they resulted in serious harm requiring substantial intervention or prolonged recovery, involved a life threatening event, or led to a fatal outcome. Potentially preventable events included those definitively, probably, or possibly preventable.

resultsAmong 1009 patients reviewed, adverse events were identified in 38.0% (95% confidence interval 32.6 to 43.4), with major adverse events occurring in 15.9% (12.7 to 19.0). Of 593 identified adverse events, 353 (59.5%) were potentially preventable and 123 (20.7%) were definitely or probably preventable. The most common adverse events were related to surgical procedures (n=292, 49.3%), followed by adverse drug events (n=158, 26.6%), healthcare associated infections (n=74, 12.4%), patient care events (n=66, 11.2%), and blood transfusion reactions (n=3, 0.5%). Adverse events were most frequent in general care units (n=289, 48.8%), followed by operating rooms (n=155, 26.1%), intensive care units (n=77, 13.0%), recovery rooms (n=20, 3.3%), emergency departments (n=11, 1.8%), and other in-hospital locations (n=42, 7.0%). Professions most involved were attending physicians (n=531, 89.5%), followed by nurses (n=349, 58.9%), residents (n=294, 49.5%), advanced level practitioners (n=169, 28.5%), and fellows (n=68, 11.5%).

conclusionsAdverse events were identified in more than one third of patients admitted to hospital for surgery, with nearly half of the events classified as major and most potentially preventable. These findings emphasize the critical need for ongoing improvement in patient safety, involving all health professionals, throughout perioperative care.

Indexed as

InpatientsPatient CarePatient SafetySurgical Procedures, OperativeAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMedical ErrorsMiddle AgedPerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39537329
PMCPMC11558683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.