Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39537198›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2025

Economic evaluation of the Liverpool heart failure virtual ward model.

Debar Rasoul, Ipsita Chattopadhyay, Tony Mayer, Jenni West, Hadleigh Stollar, Casey Black, Emeka Oguguo, Rosie Kaur, Rachael MacDonald, Jessica Pocock and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evolution and challenges of physician-led home visits in Japan.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Debar RasoulLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aintree Hospital, Liverpool, Lower Lane, L9 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0022-2052
Ipsita ChattopadhyayMHLDC Provider Collaborative, Cheshire & Merseyside, UK.
Tony MayerMHLDC Provider Collaborative, Cheshire & Merseyside, UK.
Jenni WestHealth Innovation NW Coast, Liverpool, Keckwick Lane, WA4 4AB, UK.
Hadleigh StollarHealth Innovation NW Coast, Liverpool, Keckwick Lane, WA4 4AB, UK.
Casey BlackHealth Innovation NW Coast, Liverpool, Keckwick Lane, WA4 4AB, UK.
Emeka OguguoLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aintree Hospital, Liverpool, Lower Lane, L9 7AL, UK.
Rosie KaurMersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, Prescot, L34 1PJ, UK.
Rachael MacDonaldYork Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Innovation Way, YO10 5NQ  UK.
Jessica PocockYork Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Innovation Way, YO10 5NQ  UK.
Barbara UzdzinskaYork Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Innovation Way, YO10 5NQ  UK.
Bethany UmplebyYork Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Innovation Way, YO10 5NQ  UK.
Nick HexYork Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Innovation Way, YO10 5NQ  UK.
Gregory Yoke Hong LipLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Brownlow Hill, L69 7TX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7566-1626
Rajiv SankaranarayananLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aintree Hospital, Liverpool, Lower Lane, L9 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2355-2011

Funding

Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA virtual ward (VW) supports patients who would otherwise need hospitalization by providing acute care, remote monitoring, investigations, and treatment at home. By March 2024, the VW programme had treated 10 950 patients across six speciality VWs, including heart failure (HF). This evaluation presents the economic assessment of the Liverpool HF VW. METHOD AND

resultsA comprehensive economic cost comparison model was developed by the York Health Economics Consortium (University of York) to compare the costs of the VW to standard hospital inpatient care [standard care (SC)]. The model included direct VW costs and additional costs across the care pathway. Costs and resource use for 648 patients admitted to the HF VW were calculated for 30 days post-discharge and total cohort costs were extrapolated to a full year. Primary outcomes included costs related to length of stay, readmissions, and NHS 111 contact. The total cost for the HF VW pathway, including set-up costs, was £467 524. This results in an incremental net cost benefit of £735 512 compared with the total SC cost of £1 203 036, indicating a substantial net cost benefit of £1135 per patient per episode (PPPE). This advantage remains despite initial setup expenses and ongoing costs such as home visits, virtual consultations, point-of-care testing, and home monitoring equipment.

conclusionOur HF VW model offers a substantial net cost benefit, driven by reduced hospital stays, fewer emergency department visits, and lower readmission rates. The study highlights the importance of considering system-wide impacts and continuous monitoring of VWs as they develop.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHospitalizationTelemedicineAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, EconomicEconomic analysisHeart failureHospital at homeRemote monitoringVirtual Ward

Identifiers

PMID39537198
PMCPMC11879297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.