Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39536860›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of pediatrics2025

The Pittsburgh Study: A Tiered Model to Support Parents during Early Childhood.

Chelsea Weaver Krug, Alan L Mendelsohn, Jordan Wuerth, Erin Roby, Daniel S Shaw

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05444205 (The Pittsburgh Study Early Childhood Collaborative), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05444205 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Pittsburgh Study Early Childhood Collaborative

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2020 to 2031Enrolled24,000ConditionsChild Development, Child Language, Child Behavior Problem, ParentingArmsText4Baby or Bright by Text Referral, Nurture Program Warm Referral, Video Interaction Project, Family Check-UP, Smart Beginnings
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Annual Research Review: Early conduct problems - precursors, outcomes, and etiology.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chelsea Weaver KrugDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: chelsea.krug@pitt.edu.
Alan L MendelsohnNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Jordan WuerthDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Erin RobyNYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Daniel S ShawDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

Integrated model for promoting parenting and early school readiness in pediatrics: Follow-up and getting ready for scaleR01HD076390 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MENDELSOHN, ALAN L., MORRIS-PEREZ, PAMELA A · 2014 to 2023
$10.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the feasibility of implementing The Pittsburgh Study's (TPS) Early Childhood Collaborative, a population-level, community-partnered initiative to promote relational health by offering accessible preventive parenting program options for families with young children. STUDY

designTPS partnered with healthcare and community agencies serving families in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, to enroll and screen 878 parents of 1040 children 4-years-old and under. Participants were assigned to 1 of 4 tiered groups based on identified needs: (1) universal, (2) targeted/universal, (3) secondary/tertiary, or (4) tertiary programs. Parents were offered choices in empirically supported parenting programs within group ranging from texting programs to intensive home visiting. Program selection was optional. Chi-square tests were conducted to examine the likelihood of selecting a program by group.

resultsAbout 25% of participants were assigned to each tiered group; 78% of parents chose to enroll in a parenting program. In general, parents with higher levels of adversity were more likely to select a parenting program compared with those reporting less adversity, including secondary/tertiary vs targeted/universal groups (81.4% vs 72.8%), and tertiary vs universal and targeted/universal groups (83% vs 74.1% and 72.8%, respectively; P < .001).

conclusionsOur high program enrollment rate supports the feasibility of TPS. TPS successfully engaged families in the study by offering choices in, and optimizing accessibility to, parenting programs. TPS is highly aligned with recent recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics for tiered approaches as part of a broad public health strategy for supporting early relational health.

trial registrationThe Pittsburgh Study Early Childhood (TPS-ECC): NCT05444205.

Indexed as

ParentingParentsAdultChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMalePennsylvaniaearly childhoodparentingpopulation healthpreventionrelational health

Identifiers

PMID39536860
PMCPMC12333661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.