ArticleCell stem cell2025
Post-transplant G-CSF impedes engraftment of gene-edited human hematopoietic stem cells by exacerbating p53-mediated DNA damage response.
Article in Cell stem cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-depth characterization of stem cell potency and genotoxicity for clinical-scaleMolecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Gene editing of hematopoietic stem cells: applications and advances.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Cellular profile of hematopoietic stem cells mobilized by exercise versus G-CSF in healthy related donors.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- From toxicity to immunity: Evaluating CAR-T and conventional therapies in multiple myeloma through quality-adjusted life year (QALY) outcomes.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Review
- The hidden risks of CRISPR/Cas: structural variations and genome integrity.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly used to accelerate recovery from neutropenia following chemotherapy and autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) for malignant disorders. However, its utility after ex vivo gene therapy in human HSPCs remains unexplored. We show that administering G-CSF from day 1 to 14 post-transplant impedes engraftment of CRISPR-Cas9 gene-edited human HSPCs in murine xenograft models. G-CSF affects gene-edited HSPCs through a cell-intrinsic mechanism, causing proliferative stress and amplifying the early p53-mediated DNA damage response triggered by Cas9-mediated DNA double-strand breaks. This underscores a threshold mechanism where p53 activation must reach a critical level to impair cellular function. Transiently inhibiting p53 or delaying the initiation of G-CSF treatment to day 5 post-transplant attenuates its negative impact on gene-edited HSPCs. The potential for increased HSPC toxicity associated with post-transplant G-CSF administration in CRISPR-Cas9 autologous HSPC gene therapy warrants consideration in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.