Impact of Sublethal Disinfectant Exposure on Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Pseudomonasaeruginosa.

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Driving Antibiotic Resistance Evolution ofMicroorganisms · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohemid Maddallah Al-JebouriDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Al-Qalam University College, Kirkuk, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe problem of hospital cross-infection due to contamination of disinfectants has been recognized elsewhere. The passage of bacteria through diluted disinfectants may not only bring about phenotypic changes in their antibiograms but also changes in phage susceptibility patterns. Contact with disinfectants in sublethal concentrations allows survival and multiplication of bacteria. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Serial passage, through disinfectants at subminimal inhibitory concentrations, induced antibiotic resistance in 18% of derived phenotypic variants of fifty strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa which were isolated from diarrheal stools of infants in children's hospital.

resultsA proportion of these strains became susceptible to an increased number of antibiotics. The present study revealed that all the isolates were resistant to tetracycline and carbenicillin and 40% of these isolates became sensitive to both antibiotics after exposure to disinfectants. The exposure to disinfectants induced neomycin resistance among two isolates. The resistance patterns were three before disinfectants exposure which increased to be nine different patterns after exposure. No antibiotic resistance was transferred between P. aeruginosa and Escherichia coli K12 as a recipient strain.

conclusionsAlmost 50% of the isolates tested became sensitive to tetracycline, carbenicillin and co-trimoxazole after exposure to disinfectants. The resistance patterns among the 50 isolates were three which changed to be nine different patterns after exposure to disinfectants. Unjustifiable use of disinfectants might give a chance for survival and multiplication of pathogenic bacteria to develop new resistance patterns to antibiotics in use with a short time. These new resistance variants of bacteria which multiply in hospital environment could lead to serious epidemic conflicts particularly the epidemiological reporting and management.

objectiveThe problem of hospital cross-infection due to contamination of disinfectants has been recognized elsewhere. The passage of bacteria through diluted disinfectants may not only bring about phenotypic changes in their antibiograms but also changes in phage susceptibility patterns. Contact with disinfectants in sublethal concentrations allows survival and multiplication of bacteria. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Serial passage, through disinfectants at subminimal inhibitory concentrations, induced antibiotic resistance in 18% of derived phenotypic variants of fifty strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa which were isolated from diarrheal stools of infants in children's hospital.

resultsA proportion of these strains became susceptible to an increased number of antibiotics. The present study revealed that all the isolates were resistant to tetracycline and carbenicillin and 40% of these isolates became sensitive to both antibiotics after exposure to disinfectants. The exposure to disinfectants induced neomycin resistance among two isolates. The resistance patterns were three before disinfectants exposure which increased to be nine different patterns after exposure. No antibiotic resistance was transferred between P. aeruginosa and Escherichia coli K12 as a recipient strain.

conclusionsAlmost 50% of the isolates tested became sensitive to tetracycline, carbenicillin and co-trimoxazole after exposure to disinfectants. The resistance patterns among the 50 isolates were three which changed to be nine different patterns after exposure to disinfectants. Unjustifiable use of disinfectants might give a chance for survival and multiplication of pathogenic bacteria to develop new resistance patterns to antibiotics in use with a short time. These new resistance variants of bacteria which multiply in hospital environment could lead to serious epidemic conflicts particularly the epidemiological reporting and management.

Indexed as

DisinfectantsDrug Resistance, BacterialPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbenicillinCross InfectionHumansInfantMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas InfectionsTetracyclineAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbenicillinDisinfectantsTetracyclineAntibiotic resistanceChanging resistanceDisinfectant exposurePseudomonas aeruginosa