ReviewVirology2025
Strengths and limitations of SARS-CoV-2 virus-like particle systems.
Review in Virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rab10 coordinates SADS-CoV non-lytic egress through the ERGIC-TGN-lysosome trafficking pathway.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Structural and Accessory Proteins: Emerging Opportunities for Small-Molecule Coronavirus Antivirals.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- BST-2 inhibits SARS-CoV-2 egress at intracellular membranes and is neutralized by ORF7a.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Protein nanocages: A new frontier in mucosal vaccine delivery and immune activation.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Host protein ARF1 is a proviral factor for SARS-CoV-2 and a candidate broad-spectrum therapeutic target.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Immunogenicity of virus-like particle vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2 infection.Access microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Virus-like particles (VLPs) resemble the parent virus but lack the viral genome, providing a safe and efficient platform for the analysis of virus assembly and budding as well as the development of vaccines and drugs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the formation of SARS-CoV-2 VLPs was investigated as an alternative to authentic virions because the latter requires biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) facilities. This allowed researchers to model its assembly and budding processes, examine the role of mutations in variants of concern, and determine how the structural proteins interact with each other. Also, the absence of viral genome in VLPs circumvents worries of gains in infectivity via mutagenesis. This review summarizes the strengths and limitations of several SARS-CoV-2 VLP systems and details some of the strides that have been made in using these systems to study virus assembly and budding, viral entry, and antibody and vaccine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.