ArticleEcotoxicology and environmental safety2024
Determining bad actors: A linear mixed effects model approach to elucidate behavioral toxicity of metal mixtures in drinking water.
Article in Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perinatal exposure to metal mixtures disrupts neuronal function and behavior.Environmental research · 2026Article
- Perinatal Exposure to Metal Mixtures Disrupts Neuronal Function and Behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mixtures of chemical contaminants can pose a significant health risk to humans and wildlife, even at levels considered safe for each individual chemical. There is a critical need to develop statistical methods to evaluate the drivers of toxic effects in chemical mixtures (i.e., bad actors) from exposure studies. Here, we develop a hierarchical modeling framework to disentangle the toxicity of complex metal mixtures from a screening study of 92 drinking well water samples containing multiple metal elements from Maine and New Hampshire, USA. In order to screen for neurodevelopmental impacts from exposure to these drinking water samples, we use a larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) behavioral assay. Zebrafish are an advantageous toxicological model organism due to combining the complexity of a vertebrate organism and higher-throughput exposure methods. We formulate a linear mixed modeling approach that captures intrinsic complexity in a common larval behavioral assay in order to improve its sensitivity and rigor and identify drivers of behavioral toxicity from the metal mixtures within the drinking water samples. Our analysis identifies lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), barium (Ba), and uranium (U) as metals that consistently impact larval locomotor activity, individually and across nine pairs of those metals. Our model also elucidates three distinct clusters of metal mixture components that drive behavioral effects: (Ba:Cu:U), (Ni:Pb:U), (Ba:Pb:U). Having identified a set of "bad-actor" metals from the water samples, we conduct exposure experiments for each individual metal (Pb, Cd, Ni, Cu, and Ba) at levels considered safe by the US Environmental Protection Agency drinking water regulatory limits and validate Pb, Ni, Cu, and Ba as behavioral toxicants at these concentrations. Collectively, our modeling approach estimates the impact of metal elements on a complex behavioral outcome in a statistically robust manner and establishes an approach to capture "bad actors" and key chemical interactions in a complex mixture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.