ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
Revised 4-Point Water Model for the Classical Drude Oscillator Polarizable Force Field: SWM4-HLJ.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Interpretation of Temperature-Induced DNA Melting Monitored through Base Dipole Moment Changes as a Surrogate of the Hypochromic Shift.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Bayesian Modeling of Polarizable Water: Lessons for Force Field Development.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Insights into the Electronic and Structural Properties of Cellulose and Amylose: A Comparative Force Field Study.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Computationally Efficient Polarizable MD Simulations: A Simple Water Model for the Classical Drude Oscillator Polarizable Force Field.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work the 4-point polarizable SWM4 Drude water model is reparametrized. Multiple models were developed using different strategies toward reproduction of specific target data. Results indicate that no individual model can reproduce all the selected target data in the context of the present form of the potential energy function. The changes considered in the new models include, 1) variations in the gas phase dipole moment, 2) variations in the molecular polarizability, 3) variations of the distance between the oxygen and the M site, 4) variation of the oxygen Lennard-Jones (LJ) parameters, 5) introduction of a LJ potential to the hydrogen atoms, and 6) variations of the H-O-H angle. Detailed analysis is presented for 3 new water models from which a final model, SWM4-HLJ, is selected as the future default model for the Drude polarizable force field. The model maintains the gas phase dipole moment as the experimental value while the remaining listed terms were adjusted including a larger H-O-H angle (108.12). Compared to its predecessor, SWM4-NDP, the self-diffusion coefficient, water dimer properties, and water cluster energies are greatly improved. The temperature dependence of the density of the new model also performs better. Overall, the new SWM4-HLJ water model is a general improvement and a good balance between microscopic and bulk properties is achieved.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.