ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
Generalizable self-supervised learning for brain CTA in acute stroke.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are AI Neuroimaging Models Ready for Clinical Use? A Systematic Methodological Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Transforming Intracerebral Hemorrhage Care with Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Can CTA-Based Machine Learning Identify Patients for Whom Successful Endovascular Stroke Therapy Is Insufficient?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute stroke management involves rapid and accurate interpretation of CTA imaging data. However, generalizable models for multiple acute stroke tasks able to learn from unlabeled data do not exist. We propose a linear probed self-supervised contrastive learning utilizing 3D CTA images and the findings section of radiologists' reports for pretraining. Subsequently, the pretrained model was applied to four disparate tasks: large vessel occlusion (LVO) detection, acute ischemic stroke detection, acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage classification, and ischemic core volume prediction. The tasks chosen are particularly challenging as they cannot be directly extracted from the radiology reports findings with keywords. The difficulty is compounded by the 3D feature representation required by tasks such as LVO detection. All imaging models were trained from scratch. In the pretraining phase, our dataset comprised 1,542 pairs of 3D CTA brains and corresponding radiologists' reports from 3 sites without any additional labels. To test the generalizability, we performed fine-tuning and testing phase with labeled data from another site on CTA brains from 592 subjects. In our experiments, we evaluated the influence of linear probing during the pretraining phase and found that, on average, it enhanced our model's generalizability, as shown by the improved classification performance with the appropriate text encoder. Our findings indicate that the best-performing models exhibit robust generalization to out-of-distribution data for multiple tasks. In all scenarios, linear probing during pretraining yielded superior predictive performance compared to a standard strategy. Furthermore, pretraining with reports findings conferred significant performance advantages compared to training the imaging encoder solely on labeled data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.