Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39536315›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Comprehensive Symptom Prediction in Inpatients With Acute Psychiatric Disorders Using Wearable-Based Deep Learning Models: Development and Validation Study.

Minseok Hong, Ri-Ra Kang, Jeong Hun Yang, Sang Jin Rhee, Hyunju Lee, Yong-Gyom Kim, KangYoon Lee, HongGi Kim, Yu Sang Lee, Tak Youn and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Multimodal Learning in Psychiatry: A Scoping Review.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Minseok HongDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6028-8286
Ri-Ra KangDepartment of IT Convergence Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0004-5932-8120
Jeong Hun YangDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1286-264X
Sang Jin RheeDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6221-5953
Hyunju LeeDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4237-070X
Yong-Gyom KimDepartment of IT Convergence Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0007-4701-2454
KangYoon LeeDepartment of IT Convergence Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3078-6166
HongGi KimHealthconnect Co. Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0000-7705-9711
Yu Sang LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Yong-In Mental Hospital, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3411-9790
Tak YounDepartment of Psychiatry and Electroconvulsive Therapy Center, Dongguk University International Hospital, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5239-1993
Se Hyun KimDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7078-2835
Yong Min AhnDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4458-797X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing the complex and multifaceted symptoms of patients with acute psychiatric disorders proves to be significantly challenging for clinicians. Moreover, the staff in acute psychiatric wards face high work intensity and risk of burnout, yet research on the introduction of digital technologies in this field remains limited. The combination of continuous and objective wearable sensor data acquired from patients with deep learning techniques holds the potential to overcome the limitations of traditional psychiatric assessments and support clinical decision-making.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate wearable-based deep learning models to comprehensively predict patient symptoms across various acute psychiatric wards in South Korea.

methodsParticipants diagnosed with schizophrenia and mood disorders were recruited from 4 wards across 3 hospitals and prospectively observed using wrist-worn wearable devices during their admission period. Trained raters conducted periodic clinical assessments using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and Young Mania Rating Scale. Wearable devices collected patients' heart rate, accelerometer, and location data. Deep learning models were developed to predict psychiatric symptoms using 2 distinct approaches: single symptoms individually (Single) and multiple symptoms simultaneously via multitask learning (Multi). These models further addressed 2 problems: within-subject relative changes (Deterioration) and between-subject absolute severity (Score). Four configurations were consequently developed for each scale: Single-Deterioration, Single-Score, Multi-Deterioration, and Multi-Score. Data of participants recruited before May 1, 2024, underwent cross-validation, and the resulting fine-tuned models were then externally validated using data from the remaining participants.

resultsOf the 244 enrolled participants, 191 (78.3%; 3954 person-days) were included in the final analysis after applying the exclusion criteria. The demographic and clinical characteristics of participants, as well as the distribution of sensor data, showed considerable variations across wards and hospitals. Data of 139 participants were used for cross-validation, while data of 52 participants were used for external validation. The Single-Deterioration and Multi-Deterioration models achieved similar overall accuracy values of 0.75 in cross-validation and 0.73 in external validation. The Single-Score and Multi-Score models attained overall R² values of 0.78 and 0.83 in cross-validation and 0.66 and 0.74 in external validation, respectively, with the Multi-Score model demonstrating superior performance.

conclusionsDeep learning models based on wearable sensor data effectively classified symptom deterioration and predicted symptom severity in participants in acute psychiatric wards. Despite lower computational costs, Multi models demonstrated equivalent or superior performance than Single models, suggesting that multitask learning is a promising approach for comprehensive symptom prediction. However, significant variations were observed across wards, which presents a key challenge for developing clinical decision support systems in acute psychiatric wards. Future studies may benefit from recurring local validation or federated learning to address generalizability issues.

Indexed as

Deep LearningInpatientsWearable Electronic DevicesAcute DiseaseAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRepublic of KoreaSchizophreniaclinical decision support systemdeep learningdigital phenotypelocal validationmental health facilitymental health monitoringmultitask learningsmart hospitalwearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID39536315
PMCPMC11602769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.