Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39536309›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

An Electronic Medical Record-Based Prognostic Model for Inpatient Falls: Development and Internal-External Cross-Validation.

Rex Parsons, Robin Blythe, Susanna Cramb, Ahmad Abdel-Hafez, Steven McPhail

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rex ParsonsAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6053-8174
Robin BlytheAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3643-4332
Susanna CrambAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9041-9531
Ahmad Abdel-HafezCollege of Computing and Information Technology, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-6022-9745
Steven McPhailAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1463-662X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective fall prevention interventions in hospitals require appropriate allocation of resources early in admission. To address this, fall risk prediction tools and models have been developed with the aim to provide fall prevention strategies to patients at high risk. However, fall risk assessment tools have typically been inaccurate for prediction, ineffective in prevention, and time-consuming to complete. Accurate, dynamic, individualized estimates of fall risk for admitted patients using routinely recorded data may assist in prioritizing fall prevention efforts.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to develop and validate an accurate and dynamic prognostic model for inpatient falls among a cohort of patients using routinely recorded electronic medical record data.

methodsWe used routinely recorded data from 5 Australian hospitals to develop and internally-externally validate a prediction model for inpatient falls using a Cox proportional hazards model with time-varying covariates. The study cohort included patients admitted during 2018-2021 to any ward, with no age restriction. Predictors used in the model included admission-related administrative data, length of stay, and number of previous falls during the admission (updated every 12 hours up to 14 days after admission). Model calibration was assessed using Poisson regression and discrimination using the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve.

resultsThere were 1,107,556 inpatient admissions, 6004 falls, and 5341 unique fallers. The area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.899 (95% CI 0.88-0.91) at 24 hours after admission and declined throughout admission (eg, 0.765, 95% CI 0.75-0.78 on the seventh day after admission). Site-dependent overestimation and underestimation of risk was observed on the calibration plots.

conclusionsUsing a large dataset from multiple hospitals and robust methods to model development and validation, we developed a prognostic model for inpatient falls. It had high discrimination, suggesting the model has the potential for operationalization in clinical decision support for prioritizing inpatients for fall prevention. Performance was site dependent, and model recalibration may lead to improved performance.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsElectronic Health RecordsInpatientsAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRisk Assessmentclinical decisionclinical prediction modelelectronic medical recordEMRfallshospitalin-hospital fallinpatient fallsinterventionpatient safetyprognosticrisk assessmentsupport systemsurvival model

Identifiers

PMID39536309
PMCPMC11602763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.