Observational studyRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2024
Prolonged urinary retention in COVID-19 survivors: observational study.
Observational study in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveInitially diagnosed as a respiratory disease, SARS-CoV-2 revealed numerous extrapulmonary implications. The aim of this study was to investigate prolonged urinary retention in survivors post-COVID-19 infection that led to hospitalization.
methodsA retrospective cohort analysis included male and female patients hospitalized during the COVID-19 pandemic in a reference center hospital. Exclusions were patients with a history of lower urinary tract surgeries or symptoms, including urinary incontinence, those using medication affecting detrusor contractile activity, and those with established neurological diseases. Clinical, laboratory, and radiographic data were obtained from medical records and analyzed using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and Dunn tests.
resultsThe study included 834 patients, with 471 (56.5%) male and 363 (43.5%) female. Of these, 300 patients used a urinary catheter, and 12.6% were unable to remove it due to sustained urinary retention. Orotracheal intubation, thrombocytopenia, urinary tract infections, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were associated with urinary retention. Correlation analysis showed that the highest percentage of pulmonary involvement on computed tomography was related to longer catheterization time and failed attempts to remove the catheter, affecting men and women equally.
conclusionsUrinary tract involvement in COVID-19 infection is increasingly evident. The correlation between COVID-19 severity and failure to remove the urinary catheter in a similar percentage of men and women reinforces the hypothesis that sex-independent urothelial injury and bladder dysfunction might be caused by COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.