ArticleCadernos de saude publica2024
[Effectiveness of the Adequate Childbirth Program in reducing cesarean section rates in private maternity hospitals in São Paulo , Brazil].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cesarean section is a life-saving intervention, but its use without obstetric indication leads to short- and long-term complications. Brazil is internationally known for its high cesarean rates, especially in the private sector. To reverse this problem, the Brazilian National Regulatory for Private Health Insurance and Plans launched the Adequate Childbirth Program, and this retrospective study aims to analyze its effectiveness. We included the total of births performed in private maternity hospitals between 2014 and 2019 registered on the Brazilian Information System on Live Births (SINASC) database to compare the evolution of cesarean section rates in hospitals participating and not participating in the project. A total of 277,747 births were analyzed, showing a reduction in the cesarean section rate in both groups but more pronounced among the participant institutions. No reduction in cesarean performance was observed before the program launch (2014), but there was a constant downward trend after 2014, until it became significant in 2018. This result occurred independently of demographic, maternal, and Robson group variables. The cesarean section rate of hospitals participating in the program went from 83.8% to 72.3% (95% confidence interval - 95%CI: 71.7-72.9). Despite the reduction, it remains well above the expected rates according to the c-model tool, which would be 45.2% (95%CI: 33.9-56.5) for this population. Results showed that a well-conducted public policy together with private institutions can change the scenario of labor and birth care, reducing high cesarean section rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.