Trial reportBrazilian oral research2024
Efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix in the treatment of gingival recessions: a controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Brazilian oral research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative Effectiveness of Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafts and Xenogeneic Soft Tissue Substitutes for Multiple Gingival Recessions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of a Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft and a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix in Combination with a Coronally Advanced Flap for Gingival Recession Coverage with 12-Month Follow-Up: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Emerging, personalized, and minimally invasive technologies for periodontal and peri-implant soft and hard tissue regenerative therapy.Journal of periodontology · 2026Review
- Mucogingival surgery techniques: Coronally advanced flap versus tunnel approach.Journal of periodontology · 2026Review
- Biostimulation-Based Approaches for Gingival Tissue Augmentation in Thin Periodontal Phenotype: Potential Applications for Orthodontic Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Biomaterials for Guided Tissue Regeneration and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) in treating gingival recessions (GR) in a thin gingival phenotype. This double-blind, planned, controlled, split-mouth clinical trial included 30 patients with bilateral recessions, randomly assigned to a test group (extended flap + XCM) and a control group (extended flap + connective tissue graft; CTG). Root coverage at 18 months was 1.75 ± 0.8 mm (72.9%) and 2.4 ± 0.51 mm (88.9%) in the test and the control groups, respectively. The upper limit of the confidence interval was not greater than the non-inferiority margin of 0.69 mm. The increase in gingival thickness was greater for autogenous graft (p = 0.003). Both treatments improved quality of life at 18 months. The keratinized tissue width (KTW) increased significantly in the grafted teeth, in both the test (p < 0.001) and the control groups (p < 0.001). Total root coverage was similar in both groups, reaching 70% and 66.7% in the control and test groups, respectively, with no significant differences observed for partial or complete root coverage (CRC). An association was observed in the quality of the gingival phenotype at 18 months according to the treatment group, i.e., a higher percentage of cases with a thicker phenotype was observed in the control group (86.7%), compared with the test group (53.3%) (p = 0.005). XCM was effective in treating GR, but CTG had better results because of significantly increased gingival thickness and phenotypic conversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.