Trial reportBrazilian oral research2024
Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of spray and tablet flurbiprofen for pain after soft tissue surgery.
Trial report in Brazilian oral research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this randomized clinical study was to assess the comparative efficacy of flurbiprofen in tablet and spray formulations for postoperative pain management in oral soft tissue wounds undergoing primary closure while investigating the feasibility of achieving optimal analgesia with reduced dosage and risk. Forty patients who underwent epulis fissuratum and frenulum excision for pre-prosthetic surgery were randomly assigned to receive either tablet or spray forms of flurbiprofen. The lesion dimensions were measured preoperatively, followed by excision and primary closure. The tablet group received oral tablets containing 100 mg of flurbiprofen twice daily, whereas the spray group received an oral spray containing 0.25% flurbiprofen, administered as two sprays thrice daily. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) until the 7th day. Lesion size, drug consumption, and rescue analgesic use were compared between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the lesion size between the groups. However, the mean NRS score in the spray group was significantly lower in the spray group compared to than that in the tablet group at 6th hour postoperatively (p = 0.037). Significant differences favoring the tablet group were observed in the first three doses of the drug (p = 0.001). No patients required rescue analgesics. The spray formulation of flurbiprofen demonstrated effective and safe pain relief in oral soft tissue wounds undergoing primary closure, with no reported adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.