Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39536078›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Neural dynamics of shifting attention between perception and working-memory contents.

Daniela Gresch, Sage E P Boettcher, Chetan Gohil, Freek van Ede, Anna C Nobre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Shared Theta-Rhythmic Process for Selective Sampling of Environmental Information and Internally Stored Information.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neural Dynamics of Reselecting Visual and Motor Contents in Working Memory after External Interference.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Neural dynamics of shifting attention between perception and working-memory contents.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniela GreschDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9072-4958
Sage E P BoettcherDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0338-0646
Chetan GohilOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0888-1207
Freek van EdeInstitute for Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam, Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7434-1751
Anna C NobreDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5762-2802

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) 850636James S. McDonnell Foundation (JSMF) 220020448Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) 14721Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (WT) 104571/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust (WT) 203139/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In everyday tasks, our focus of attention shifts seamlessly between contents in the sensory environment and internal memory representations. Yet, research has mainly considered external and internal attention in isolation. We used magnetoencephalography to compare the neural dynamics of shifting attention to visual contents within vs. between the external and internal domains. Participants performed a combined perception and working-memory task in which two sequential cues guided attention to upcoming (external) or memorized (internal) sensory information. Critically, the second cue could redirect attention to visual content within the same or alternative domain as the first cue. Multivariate decoding unveiled distinct patterns of human brain activity when shifting attention within vs. between domains. Brain activity distinguishing within- from between-domain shifts was broadly distributed and highly dynamic. Intriguingly, crossing domains did not invoke an additional stage prior to shifting attention. Alpha lateralization, a canonical marker of shifting spatial attention, showed no delay when cues redirected attention to the same vs. alternative domain. Instead, evidence suggested that neural states associated with a given domain linger and influence subsequent shifts of attention within vs. between domains. Our findings provide critical insights into the neural dynamics that govern attentional shifts between perception and working memory.

Indexed as

AttentionMagnetoencephalographyMemory, Short-TermAdultBrainCuesFemaleHumansMaleVisual PerceptionYoung Adultalphadecodingexternal attentioninternal attentionMEG

Identifiers

PMID39536078
PMCPMC11588118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.