Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39536032›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Patterns, clusters, and transitions in U.S. state ENDS policy implementation: 2010-2020.

Callie Zaborenko, Mike Vuolo, Jennifer L Maggs, Jeremy Staff, Brian C Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Callie ZaborenkoDept of Sociology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-5859
Mike VuoloDept of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2916-0046
Jennifer L MaggsDept of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-6990
Jeremy StaffDept of Sociology & Criminology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Brian C KellyDept of Sociology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2039-1347

Funding

Effects of Tobacco & ENDS Policies on Patterns of Adolescent ENDS UseR01DA054234 · NIDA · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KELLY, BRIAN C · 2021 to 2023
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA054234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), such as e-cigarettes, have become increasingly used across the world. To respond to global public health challenges associated with vaping, governments have implemented numerous ENDS policies. This research highlights the patterns, clustering, and transitions in U.S. state ENDS policy implementation from 2010 to 2020. Policy data for tobacco and ENDS policies primarily from the Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation (ANRF) were analyzed for the years 2010 to 2020 for all fifty states and Washington, D.C. Patterns and clusters of policies were assessed. Latent trajectories were modeled for ENDS policies across states over time. ENDS policies commonly have analogous tobacco control policies in place prior to their implementation. ENDS policies in states were commonly implemented in "bundles." The temporal trajectories of ENDS policy implementation occurred in 3 latent forms. A majority of states were "catch-up implementers," indicating their slow initial implementation but stronger position by the end of the period of observation in 2020. These trajectories of ENDS policies were not associated with any individual tobacco control policy in place at the start of the trajectory in 2010. The development of ENDS policies in U.S. states has been temporally and geographically uneven. Many states that had initially been slow to implement ENDS policies caught up by 2020. The implementation of policy "bundles" was common. The clustering of policies in bundles has important methodological implications for analyses, which should be considered in ENDS policy evaluations.

Identifiers

PMID39536032
PMCPMC11560037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.