Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39535923›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2024

Synergistic mechanisms of humic acid and biomineralization in cadmium remediation using Lysinibacillus fusiformis.

Wei Zhou, Yaqi Zhu, Varenyam Achal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei ZhouDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Shantou, China.
Yaqi ZhuDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Shantou, China.
Varenyam AchalDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Shantou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5444-7746

Funding

Shantou Science and Technology Bureau STKJ2023013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavy metal pollution, particularly cadmium, poses severe environmental and health risks due to its high toxicity and mobility, necessitating effective remediation strategies. While both microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) and humic acid adsorption are promising methods for heavy metal mitigation, their combined effects, particularly the influence of humic acid on the MICP process, have not been thoroughly investigated. This study explores the interaction between humic acid and MICP, revealing that humic acid significantly inhibits the MICP process by reducing urease activity, with the 10% humic acid treatment resulting in a 23.8% reduction in urease activity compared to the control. Additionally, while higher concentrations of humic acid did not significantly reduce cadmium ion concentrations, they did result in a slight increase in organically bound cadmium, indicating an interaction that could alter metal speciation in the soil. These findings provide important insights into the mechanisms by which humic acid affects MICP, offering a foundation for optimizing combined remediation approaches. Future research should aim to fine-tune the balance between MICP and humic acid to enhance the overall efficiency of cadmium remediation strategies. This study contributes to the development of more effective and sustainable methods for addressing cadmium contamination.

Indexed as

BiomineralizationCadmiumHumic SubstancesSoil PollutantsAdsorptionBacillaceaeBiodegradation, EnvironmentalCarbonatesEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationSoil MicrobiologyUreaseCadmiumCarbonatesHumic SubstancesSoil PollutantsUrease

Identifiers

PMID39535923
PMCPMC11559593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.