Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39535891›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025

Oncointerpreter.ai enables interactive, personalized summarization of cancer diagnostics data.

Arihant Tripathi, Brett Ecker, Patrick Boland, Saum Ghodoussipour, Gregory R Riedlinger, Subhajyoti De

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arihant TripathiRutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.
Brett EckerRutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.
Patrick BolandRutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.
Saum GhodoussipourRutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.
Gregory R RiedlingerRutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.
Subhajyoti DeRutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2313-8593

Funding

Computational approaches for identifying epigenomic contexts of somatic mutationsR01GM129066 · NIGMS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DE, SUBHAJYOTI · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
Computational genomic analysis of genomic variations in human tissuesR35GM149224 · NIGMS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Subhajyoti De · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
Henry Rutgers ScholarNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129066NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM149224NIH HHS R35GM149224The State University of New Jersey
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCancer diagnosis comes as a shock to many patients, and many of them feel unprepared to handle the complexity of the life-changing event, understand technicalities of the diagnostic reports, and fully engage with the clinical team regarding the personalized clinical decision-making. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe develop Oncointerpreter.ai an interactive resource to offer personalized summarization of clinical cancer genomic and pathological data, and frame questions or address queries about therapeutic opportunities in near-real time via a graphical interface. It is built on the Mistral-7B and Llama-2 7B large language models trained on a local database trained using a large, curated corpus.

resultsWe showcase its utility with case studies, where Oncointerpreter.ai extracted key clinical and molecular attributes from deidentified pathology and clinical genomics reports, summarized their contextual significance and answered queries on pertinent treatment options. Oncointerpreter also provided personalized summary of currently active clinical trials that match the patients' disease status, their selection criteria, and geographic locations. Benchmarking and comparative assessment indicated that the model responses were generally consistent, and hallucination, ie, factually incorrect or nonsensical response was rare; treatment- and outcome related queries led to context-aware responses, and response time correlated with verbosity. DISCUSSION: The choice of model and domain-specific training also affected the response quality.

conclusionOncointerpreter.ai can aid the existing clinical care with interactive, individualized summarization of diagnostics data to promote informed dialogs with the patients with new cancer diagnoses. AVAILABILITY: https://github.com/Siris2314/Oncointerpreter.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineArtificial IntelligenceGenomicsHumansUser-Computer Interfacecancerdiagnosisinteractivelarge language modelssummarization

Identifiers

PMID39535891
PMCPMC11648722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.