Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39535863›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2025

A framework for developing generic implant safety procedures for scanning patients with medical implants and devices in MRI.

Jonathan P Ashmore, Sarah J Prescott, John McLean, Daniel J Wilson, Geoff Charles-Edwards, Peter Wright, David Grainger, Gareth J Barker, Alexandra J Lipton, Rachel Watt and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jonathan P AshmoreDepartment of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, NHS Highland, Inverness, IV2 3UJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5170-3772
Sarah J PrescottRadiology Physics Department, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, ST4 6QG, United Kingdom.
John McLeanMRI Physics, Department of Clinical Physics and Bioengineering, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Langlands Dr, Glasgow, G51 4LB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0006-2595-8575
Daniel J WilsonMedical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.
Geoff Charles-EdwardsGuy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Peter WrightUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, United Kingdom.
David GraingerMedicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, E14 4PU, United Kingdom.
Gareth J BarkerDepartment of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AB, United Kingdom.
Alexandra J LiptonSociety of Radiographers, London, SE1 2EW, United Kingdom.
Rachel WattCircle Health Group, Albyn Hospital, Aberdeen, AB10 1RW, United Kingdom.
Deepa GopalanImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, W110HS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8079-205X
Mark R RadonThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, L9 7LJ, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

UK guidelines for MR safety recommend that MRI departments refer to the implant manufacturer for advice regarding the MRI safety of scanning patients with an implantable medical device prior to scanning. This process of assuring safety can be time consuming, leading to delays and potential cancellations of a patient's MRI. Furthermore, at times the implant cannot be identified, or the implant manufacturers cannot provide up to date MRI safety information. The purpose of generic implant safety procedures is to define a process for managing patients with certain types of implants where the risk from scanning is low. This process incorporates scope for an evidence-based risk-benefit decision to scan some groups of patients under locally approved conditions, without seeking to identify the exact make and model of the implant and subsequent assurance of MR safety from the implant manufacturer. This publication provides best practice recommendations from a multi-professional working group for the development of these procedures. It is supported by The Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, The Society of Radiographers, The Royal College of Radiologists, The British Institute of Radiology, The British Association of MR Radiographers, The International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine British and Irish Chapter, and the NHS Scotland MRI Physics Group.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPatient SafetyProstheses and ImplantsEquipment SafetyHumansUnited KingdomImplantMRISafety

Identifiers

PMID39535863
PMCPMC11840167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.