ArticleGenetics2025
Network hub gene detection using the entire solution path information.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- tvsfglasso: Time-varying scale-free graphical lasso for network estimation from time-series data.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene co-expression networks typically comprise modules and their associated hub genes, which are regulating numerous downstream interactions within the network. Methods for hub screening, as well as data-driven estimation of hub co-expression networks using graphical models, can serve as useful tools for identifying these hubs. Graphical model-based penalization methods typically have one or multiple regularization terms, each of which encourages some favorable characteristics (e.g. sparsity, hubs, and power-law) to the estimated complex gene network. It is common practice to find a single optimal graphical model corresponding to a specific value of the regularization parameter(s). However, instead of doing this, one could aggregate information across several graphical models, all of which depend on the same data set, along the solution path in the hub gene detection process. We propose a novel method for detecting hub genes that utilizes the information available in the solution path. Our procedure is related to stability selection, but we replace resampling with a simple statistic. This procedure amalgamates information from each node of the data-driven graphical models into a single influence statistic, similar to Cook's distance. We call this statistic the Mean Degree Squared Distance (MDSD). Our simulation and empirical studies demonstrate that the MDSD statistic maintains a good balance between false positive and true positive hubs. An R package MDSD is publicly available on GitHub under the General Public License https://github.com/markkukuismin/MDSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.