Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39535812›Full record

Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2025

Symptom Screening for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

L Lee Dupuis, Donna L Johnston, David Dix, Sarah McKillop, Sadie Cook, Nicole Crellin-Parsons, Ketan Kulkarni, Serina Patel, Magimairajan Lssai Vanan, Paul Gibson and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03593525 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Symptom Screening by Children With Cancer and Feedback to Providers), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03593525 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Symptom Screening by Children With Cancer and Feedback to Providers

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenRan2018 to 2023Enrolled345ConditionsPediatric Oncology, Quality of LifeArmsSPARK
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Scaling up symptom screening for routine use in pediatric oncology: provincial implementation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Do Not Throw Away Your Patient's Shot at Complete Vomiting Control.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  15. Adherence to daily electronic symptom screening in pediatric cancer: associations with time, location and pain.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

L Lee DupuisProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Donna L JohnstonDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
David DixDivision of Hematology/Oncology, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sarah McKillopDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sadie CookProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nicole Crellin-ParsonsProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ketan KulkarniDivision of Hematology/Oncology, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Serina PatelDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Magimairajan Lssai VananPediatric Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplant, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Paul GibsonPediatric Hematology/Oncology, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dilip SomanRotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susan KuczynskiOntario Parents Advocating for Children with Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
George A TomlinsonDepartment of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lillian SungProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Pediatric patients with cancer experience severely bothersome symptoms during treatment. It was hypothesized that symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team would reduce symptom burden in pediatric patients with cancer. Objective: To determine if daily symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team was associated with lower total symptom burden as measured by the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) compared to usual care among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial enrolled participants from July 2018 to September 2023 from 8 Canadian tertiary care centers that diagnose and treat pediatric patients with cancer. Patients aged 8 to 18 years with cancer expected to be in a hospital or clinic daily for at least 5 consecutive days were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomized to intervention (n = 176) vs control (n = 169) groups. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to December 2023. Intervention: Intervention participants completed the SSPedi once daily for 5 days. Printed symptom reports were provided daily to the health care team, and email alerts were distributed for severely bothersome symptoms. Control participants received usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was self-reported total SSPedi score on day 5. Secondary outcomes were individual SSPedi symptoms, pain, quality of life, symptom documentation, and intervention provision. The primary analysis compared the day 5 total SSPedi scores between randomized groups using a multiple linear regression model. For the secondary analysis comparing individual SSPedi symptom scores, the odds ratio for the intervention was estimated using a proportional odds model. Pain and quality of life were analyzed using the same approach as the primary outcome. Fisher exact test was used to compare symptom documentation, any intervention, and symptom-specific intervention between groups. Results: A total of 345 participants were enrolled; median (range) participant age was 13.8 (8.0-18.8) years, and 150 participants (43.5%) were female. Day 5 SSPedi score was significantly better with symptom screening compared to usual care (adjusted mean difference, -2.5; 95% CI, -3.8 to -1.2). Symptom screening reduced the odds of higher individual symptom scores; 8 of 15 symptom reductions were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in pain or quality of life scores between groups. Five symptoms were documented or treated significantly more often with symptom screening than usual care. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days, symptom screening with SSPedi improved total symptom scores compared to usual care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03593525.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHospitalizationNeoplasmsSymptom AssessmentAdolescentCanadaChildChild, HospitalizedFemaleHumansMaleQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID39535812
PMCPMC11561725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.