ArticleJAMA network open2024
Treatments and Patient Outcomes Following Stroke Center Expansion.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robot-Assisted Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke: Umbrella Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Reducing Inequalities in Stroke Events-Hemorrhagic Disparities (RISE-HD): a 10-Year Longitudinal Study in Florida.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Research on gut microbiota and metabolic characteristics in patients with sleep disorders after ischemic stroke.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal analysis of hospitalizations, mortality and access to intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke in Southern Brazil.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Stroke Technology Diffusion in Rural Settings: Differential Exposure to Certification Levels by Community Income Levels.Neurology · 2026Article
- Does Exposure to Certified Stroke Centers Affect All Communities Equitably? Stroke Patient Outcomes by Community Socioeconomic Status.Annals of emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Cardiogenic Shock Systems of Care Best Practices. Part 1: Prehospital and Emergency Department Evaluation and Management.US cardiology · 2026Review
- Incidence and risk factors for post-stroke delirium in the elderly: A national inpatient sample (NIS) analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to accessing stroke care services in Tanzania: an explorative qualitative study among stroke survivors, caregivers and healthcare providers.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Outcomes for Black and White Patients After Certification of Nearby Stroke Centers.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Stroke Center Certification and Within-Hospital Racial Disparities in Treatment.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: It is unclear how certified stroke center expansion contributes to improved access to stroke treatment and patient outcomes, and whether these outcomes differ by baseline stroke center access. Objective: To examine changes in rates of admission to stroke centers, receipt of thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, and mortality when a community gains a newly certified stroke center within a 30-minute drive. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study compared changes in patient outcomes when a community (defined by area zip code) experienced a stroke center expansion relative to the same community type that did not experience a change in access. Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke who were admitted to hospitals between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019, were included. The data analysis was performed between October 1, 2023, and September 9, 2024. Exposure: New certification of a stroke center within a 30-minute driving time of a community. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were rates of admission to a certified stroke center, receipt of thrombolytics (delivered using drip-and-ship and drip-and-stay methods), mechanical thrombectomy, and 30-day and 1-year mortality estimated using a linear probability model with community fixed effects. Results: Among the 2 853 508 patients studied (mean [SD] age, 79.5 [8.5] years; 56% female), 66% lived in communities that had a stroke center nearby at baseline in 2009, and 34% lived in communities with no baseline access. For patients without baseline access, after stroke center expansion, the likelihood of admission to a stroke center increased by 38.98 percentage points (95% CI, 37.74-40.21 percentage points), and receipt of thrombolytics increased by 0.48 percentage points (95% CI, 0.24-0.73 percentage points). Thirty-day and 1-year mortality decreased by 0.28 percentage points (95% CI, -0.56 to -0.01) and 0.50 percentage points (95% CI, -0.84 to -0.15 percentage points), respectively, after expansion. For patients in communities with baseline stroke center access, expansion was associated with an increase of 9.37 percentage points (95% CI, 8.63-10.10 percentage points) in admission to a stroke center but no significant changes in other outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients living in communities without baseline stroke center access experienced significant increases in stroke center admission and thrombolysis and a significant decrease in mortality after a stroke center expansion. Improvements were smaller in communities with preexisting stroke center access. These findings suggest that newly certified stroke centers may provide greater benefits to underserved areas and are an important consideration when deciding when and where to expand health care services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.