ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2024
Community Palliative Care: What are the Best Models?
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A descriptive analysis of hospital-based palliative care services: a case study from Fort Portal Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- How community-based palliative care is delivered for older adults: a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- A modified world café approach to identify the core components of palliative care models for underserved populations.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on implementing the Swedish palliative care guide in geriatrics - a qualitative study using small-group and individual interviews.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Factors that support home deaths for patients receiving at-home palliative and end-of-life care: a sequential mixed-methods explanatory study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementPalliative care seeks to address the physical, psychosocial and spiritual concerns of patients with a life limiting illness and their caregivers. Early referral to palliative care improves symptoms and is the standard of care. This paper evaluates the evidence for different models of community palliative care and looks at the effects of homecare, hospice programs and residential aged care facility (RACF) interventions on symptom management, home death rate and acute health service utilization. It also examines the impact of COVID-19, telehealth, integration and staffing models on the efficacy of community palliative care. Evidence suggests that community palliative care increases the rate of death at home and may improve satisfaction with care, but effect on symptoms and acute health care utilization are less certain. Enrolment in a hospice program may decrease hospitalizations and improve satisfaction. RACF staff training interventions to improve the quality of palliative care provided to residents show mixed results across all indicators. COVID-19 saw a relative increase in the demand for community palliative care, as people opted out of the hospital system. Models of community palliative care that facilitate integration, support primary health providers, and promote technological innovation are worthy of further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39535687What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.