Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39535674›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2024

Local and systemic photobiomodulation using a 650 nm LED on skin temperature and hyperalgesia in cellulite: a randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blinded clinical trial.

Rodrigo Alvaro Brandão Lopes-Martins, Felícia Bueno, Hadassa Oliveira do Carmo Ferreira, Luara Alves Faria, Mírian Martins Barbosa Sousa, Anna Beatriz Lobo, Vilma Furtado Dos Santos Freitas, Pedro Sardinha L Lopes-Martins, Flávio Aimbire, Patrícia Sardinha Leonardo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rodrigo Alvaro Brandão Lopes-MartinsLaboratory of Biophotonics and Experimental Therapeutics - LABITEX, Evangelical University of Goiás (UniEVANGELICA), Av. Universitária Km 3.5, Anápolis, GO, Brazil. ralopesmartins@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4533-1335
Felícia BuenoLaboratory of Biophotonics and Experimental Therapeutics - LABITEX, Evangelical University of Goiás (UniEVANGELICA), Av. Universitária Km 3.5, Anápolis, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-7628
Hadassa Oliveira do Carmo FerreiraLaboratory of Biophotonics and Experimental Therapeutics - LABITEX, Evangelical University of Goiás (UniEVANGELICA), Av. Universitária Km 3.5, Anápolis, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4857-1123
Luara Alves FariaLaboratory of Biophotonics and Experimental Therapeutics - LABITEX, Evangelical University of Goiás (UniEVANGELICA), Av. Universitária Km 3.5, Anápolis, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9589-9490
Mírian Martins Barbosa SousaLaboratory of Biophotonics and Experimental Therapeutics - LABITEX, Evangelical University of Goiás (UniEVANGELICA), Av. Universitária Km 3.5, Anápolis, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8545-5279
Anna Beatriz LoboLaboratory of Biophotonics and Experimental Therapeutics - LABITEX, Evangelical University of Goiás (UniEVANGELICA), Av. Universitária Km 3.5, Anápolis, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1353-0863
Vilma Furtado Dos Santos FreitasLaboratory of Health Technologies - LATES, Evangelical University of Goiás (UniEVANGELICA), Av. Universitária Km 3.5, Anápolis, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7021-0607
Pedro Sardinha L Lopes-MartinsLaboratory of Biophotonics and Experimental Therapeutics - LABITEX, Evangelical University of Goiás (UniEVANGELICA), Av. Universitária Km 3.5, Anápolis, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-5350
Flávio AimbireLaboratório de Imunofarmacologia, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo- UNIFESP, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4290-541X
Patrícia Sardinha LeonardoLaboratory of Health Technologies - LATES, Evangelical University of Goiás (UniEVANGELICA), Av. Universitária Km 3.5, Anápolis, GO, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7662-7702

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulite is a skin condition that significantly affects women, characterized by "holes" or depressions in the skin, affecting approximately 95% of women at some point in their lives. Cellulite often presents inflammatory symptoms such as increased skin temperature and hyperalgesia. Photobiomodulation, whether applied locally or systemically, has demonstrated important anti-inflammatory effects in various conditions. This study investigates the effects of local and systemic photobiomodulation on hip culottes temperature increases and hyperalgesia in patients with grades 2 to 4 cellulite. Cellulite assessment was carried out using detailed anamnesis, photographic records, algometry, and infrared thermography. Participants received randomized bilateral treatment with or without systemic irradiation using LED photobiomodulation on the hip culottes for four weeks, three times a week. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation, especially locally applied, together or not with systemic irradiation, on cellulite hyperalgesia and skin temperature among 25 female participants. The group that received only LED treatment showed an increase in pain threshold of 8% and 20% on the right and left sides, respectively, while the group treated with LED + ILIB showed an increase in pain threshold of 32% on both sides. Local photobiomodulation produced a skin temperature decrease of 0.4 °C, while the combination of local and systemic irradiation produced an average skin temperature decrease of 1.2 °C. Our results clearly demonstrate a significantly beneficial effect of LED therapy for cellulite treatment, especially when administered in combination with mILIB, leading to a significant reduction of pain hypersensitivity and skin temperature, indicating a regional subcutaneous improvement of the inflammatory status.

Indexed as

CelluliteHyperalgesiaLow-Level Light TherapySkin TemperatureAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedCelluliteILIBInfrared thermographyLEDPhotobiomodulationRCT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.