Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39535618›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2024

[Antiarrhythmic drugs will no longer be of importance in the treatment of atrial fibrillation in the future : Pros and cons].

Andreas Metzner, Constanze Schmidt

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andreas MetznerKlinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg, Martinistraße 52, 20251, Hamburg, Deutschland. a.metzner@uke.de.
Constanze SchmidtAbteilung für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Constanze.Schmidt@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An early rhythm stabilization is the primary focus of the current treatment of atrial fibrillation. Based on current studies catheter ablation of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established component in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Therefore, in the management of affected patients this procedure should be offered at an early stage in addition to the holistic treatment approach with consistent treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and thromboembolism prophylaxis with anticoagulants. Substances with an antiarrhythmic effect can be included in a supportive role in the management of atrial fibrillation. Pharmacotherapy could also perspectively play an important role in the treatment of the underlying atrial cardiomyopathy of the phenotype of atrial fibrillation. An understanding of the atrial pathophysiology of individual patients with adapted selection of suitable treatment strategies of ablation up to pharmacotherapy is decisive for the successful antiarrhythmic outcome. The decision on the treatment strategy must always be individually made together with the affected patient. The advantages and disadvantages of both options must be explained in detail and pre-existing comorbidities and risk factors must be included. Additionally, the individual wishes of the patient must be taken into account.

Indexed as

Anti-Arrhythmia AgentsAtrial FibrillationEvidence-Based MedicineCatheter AblationForecastingHumansTreatment OutcomeAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsMultimodal antiarrhythmic therapy strategiesPatient-oriented treatmentRhythm maintenanceRhythm stabilizationTrigger and substrate treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.