ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Application of deep learning techniques for breath-hold, high-precision T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative NIR-II fluorescence guidance for precise tumor margin assessment and maximized tissue preservation in breast surgery.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Adaptive Complex Signal Average Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of the Liver: Utility in Breath-Hold Imaging: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Usefulness of Adaptive Complex Signal Average Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Abdomen.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning reconstruction improves detection of focal liver lesions in hepatobiliary phase compared to conventional EOB-MRI.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the feasibility of a high-precision single-shot fast spin-echo (SS-FSE) sequence using the deep learning-based Precise IQ Engine (PIQE) algorithm in comparison with standard SS-FSE for T2-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen, and to compare the image quality with a multi-shot (MS)-FSE sequence using the PIQE algorithm.
methodsThis retrospective study included 105 patients who underwent abdominal MR including T2-weighted sequences using the PIQE reconstruction algorithm. The image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in high-precision SS-FSE sequences using PIQE were compared to those in standard SS-FSE without PIQE and MS-FSE sequences using PIQE.
resultsThe scores for all qualitative parameters were significantly higher in high-precision SS-FSE sequence using PIQE than in standard SS-FSE sequence without PIQE (all p < 0.001). In the comparison between two high-precision sequences using PIQE, the SS-FSE sequence showed significantly better scores for the blurring, ghosts or motion/flow artifacts, conspicuity of intrahepatic structures, focal nonsolid hepatic and pancreatic cystic lesions, and overall image quality, in comparison to the MS-FSE sequence (all p < 0.001). Additionally, the SS-FSE sequence using PIQE showed significantly higher SNR of the liver and CNR of nonsolid hepatic lesions than the MS-FSE sequence using PIQE (p < 0.001).
conclusionsA high-precision SS-FSE sequence using the PIQE algorithm is a feasible alternative to the standard FSE sequence in T2-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen. It can improve image quality, the SNR of the liver, and the ability to visualize nonsolid focal liver lesions and pancreatic cystic lesions in comparison to a high-precision MS-FSE sequence using PIQE although this study was limited by single-center design and lack of pathological confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39535616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.