Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39535614›Full record

ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Next generation tissue biobanking: quality assured, financed, and integrated?]

Katja Steiger, Angela Langer, Alexander Brobeil

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katja SteigerInstitut für Allgemeine Pathologie und Pathologische Anatomie, School of Medicine and Health, TU München, München, Deutschland. katja.steiger@tum.de.
Angela LangerAugsburg Central BioBank, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland.
Alexander BrobeilGewebebank des Nationalen Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biobanks are essential for biomedical research, particularly in the era of personalized medicine. In Germany, 36 biobanks have been established over the past decade that are connected under the German Biobank Alliance (GBA). These biobanks store high-quality biological samples along with clinical data to support research projects. Biobanks can be integrated, handling both tissue and liquid samples, or set up as separate entities depending on specific requirements.Tissue biobanking is especially complex due to the invasive nature of tissue collection and the non-replicability of the samples. Close collaboration between clinics, pathologists, IT specialists, and biobank managers is crucial to ensure the quality of samples and promote interdisciplinary research.The integration of pathology and biobanking is key, both organizationally and technically. Shared IT systems, standardized protocols, and collaborative governance structures are vital for efficient data management. Quality assurance, ethical guidelines, and data protection are critical to maintaining public trust and legal compliance.Long-term financial models are needed to ensure the sustainability of biobanks. The GBA supports emerging biobanks through its "Starterkit" initiative, offering guidance and best practices to help new biobanks develop.Tissue biobanks are indispensable for advancing the understanding of diseases and developing new therapies. However, they must adhere to strict ethical and legal standards to maximize their scientific and societal value.

Indexed as

Tissue BanksBiological Specimen BanksBiomedical ResearchGermanyHumansPrecision MedicineQuality Assurance, Health CareSpecimen HandlingBiobankingBiomedical researchIntegrated BiobankingPathologyTissue biobanking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.