ArticleSkeletal radiology2025
Foreign body giant cell reaction due to Durolane (hyaluronic acid derivative) injection - A case report.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foreign body reaction: towards a macrophage-centered adverse outcome pathway for fibrotic encapsulation.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- Current Concepts in Viscosupplementation: New Classification System and Emerging Frontiers.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Hyaluronan-Related Granulomatous Synovitis, Adipositis, and Osteomyelitis in the Osteoarthritic Knee: A Morphological Case Series of Three Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis can be treated with hyaluronic acid derivatives, such as Durolane manufactured by Bioventus (Hill, 2017), particularly when conventional treatments prove ineffective. In osteoarthritic joints, the synovial fluid has a lower concentration of hyaluronic acid compared to healthy joints. Intra-articular therapy with exogenous hyaluronic acid can improve viscoelastic properties, enhance chondrocyte synthesis, reduce cartilage degradation, and alleviate pain associated with osteoarthritis (Migliore and Procopio in Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 12:31-3, 2015). This report describes a unique case where a patient, following Durolane administration, presented with an intraosseous foreign body giant cell reaction. A 2.5-cm lesion was identified on MRI, initially raising concerns for metastatic disease or multiple myeloma. Subsequent IR CT-guided biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of "foreign body giant cell reaction to gel," linked to the Durolane injection. This case presents a contribution to the literature due to the scarcity of documented instances where Durolane injection leads to an intraosseous foreign body giant cell reaction resembling metastatic disease. While a solitary intraosseous pseudotumor, reportedly due to viscosupplement injection, has been published, it differs in both location (hip vs. knee) and imaging characteristics from the presented case. The manifestation of a foreign body giant cell reaction after Durolane injection, mimicking malignant osseous lesions, merits attention among practitioners. This case underscores the necessity for further research into potential adverse reactions associated with hyaluronic acid derivatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39535592What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.