ArticleCurrent protocols2024
Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Knock-in Approaches for Manipulation of Endogenous Genes in Human B Lymphoma Cells.
Article in Current protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strategies for CRISPR-based knock-ins in primary human B cells and lymphoma cell lines.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precise understanding of temporally controlled protein-protein interactions, localization, and expression is often difficult to achieve using traditional overexpression techniques. Recent advances have made CRISPR-based knock-in approaches efficient, which enables rapid derivation of cells with tagged endogenous proteins. However, the high degree of variability in knock-in efficiency across cell types and gene loci poses challenges, in particular with B lymphocytes, which are refractory to lipid transfection. Here, we present detailed protocols for efficient B lymphoma cell CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in. We address knock-in efficiency in two ways. First, we provide a detailed approach for assessing cutting efficiency to select the most efficient single guide RNA for the gene region of interest. Second, we provide detailed approaches for tagging endogenous proteins with a fluorescent marker or instead for co-expressing them with an unlinked fluorescent marker. Either approach facilitates downstream selection of single-cell or bulk populations with the desired knock-in, particularly when knock-in efficiency is low. The utility of this approach is demonstrated via examples of engineering tags onto endogenous protein N- or C-termini, together with downstream analyses. We anticipate that this workflow can be applied more broadly to other cell types for efficient knock-in into endogenous loci. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Choosing an optimal knock-in target site and single guide RNA (sgRNA) design Basic Protocol 2: Assessment of Cas9 editing efficiency at the desired B cell genomic knock-in site Basic Protocol 3: Cloning the sgRNA dual guide construct Basic Protocol 4: Repair template design and cloning Basic Protocol 5: Electroporation and selection of engineered B cells Basic Protocol 6: Single-cell cloning of engineered B cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.