Observational studyThe Journal of dermatology2025
Real-world safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with pyoderma gangrenosum: Interim analysis of a post-marketing observational study in Japan.
Observational study in The Journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and Effectiveness of Adalimumab for the Treatment of Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A 52-Week Real-World Prospective Observational Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Pyoderma Gangrenosum in a Patient with Crohn's Disease Treated with Adalimumab: A Case-Based Review and Systematic Review of the Current Literature.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Real-world safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with pyoderma gangrenosum: Interim analysis of a post-marketing observational study in Japan.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rapidly progressive disease characterized by deep ulcers, predominantly in the lower extremities. Adalimumab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor alpha, is the first drug approved for PG treatment in Japan, ahead of other countries. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, post-marketing observational study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in Japanese patients with PG. Of 67 patients enrolled, 37 in the safety analysis set and 32 in the effectiveness analysis set were included in this interim analysis. (Nineteen patients whose case report forms were not collected and 11 whose data were not fixed by the data cut-off date were excluded from the study). In the safety analysis set, the mean age was 62.9 years and 86.5% of patients had comorbidities, including ulcerative colitis (21.6%), diabetes mellitus (18.9%), and hypertension (10.8%); subtypes of PG included ulcerative (n = 33), vegetative (n = 2), and pustular (n = 2). Mean exposure duration to adalimumab was 185.5 days. Systemic steroids were used before (70.3%) and during (56.8%) adalimumab treatment. The incidence proportion of overall adverse drug reactions was 18.9%. The incidence proportions of all infections and serious infections reported as adverse drug reactions were 13.5% and 10.8%, respectively. The proportion of patients with a Physician Global Assessment score (total lesions) of 0/1 at weeks 12, 26, and 52 was 42.9%, 36.8%, and 50.0%, respectively. This interim analysis revealed the characteristics of Japanese patients with PG treated with adalimumab in the actual clinical setting and the real-world safety and effectiveness of adalimumab. At the time of the interim analysis, adalimumab treatment was generally well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were detected. Further follow-up of this study will provide a more detailed understanding of the long-term safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in patients with PG refractory to conventional treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.