ReviewClinical and experimental dental research2024
Exploring the Variations in the Use of Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) in Literature: A Survey of Studies Published from 2014 to 2023.
Review in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Estimating the reliability of the modified dental anxiety scale: A systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis.Journal of health psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of topical vacuum assisted drainage in mandibular third molar surgeries: a randomized controlled clinical study.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- The Influence of Oral Health Related Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Oral Health Risk-Related Behaviours of People in Custodial Settings: An Integrative Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Review
- Thai Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (Thai-MDAS): cross-cultural adaptation, psychometric validation, and preliminary diagnostic accuracy.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Dental Anxiety Prevalence, Correlates, and Patient-Preferred Management Strategies in Romanian Adults: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Dental Anxiety Among Undergraduate Dental Students: A Comparative Analysis of MK-DAS and MDAS.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Patterns and influencing factors of dental implant anxiety in China.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Predicting Dental Anxiety and Cooperative Behavior in Children Using Machine Learning: A Cross-Sectional Predictive Modeling Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Etiology of Dental Anxiety and Dental Phobia: Review.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Dental service utilization among hospitalized patients with psychiatric and/or substance use disorders: a Norwegian cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- What psychometric scales did researchers use to measure dental fear, anxiety, or phobia? A literature survey from 2020 to 2024.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Reliability and Validity of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale Among Children Aged 9 to 12 Years.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesModified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) is a frequently used psychometric tool to evaluate the dental anxiety level of dental patients or the general population. However, it was largely unclear if MDAS was consistently administered in the original format in the academic literature. This work aimed to survey the literature published in the last 10 years to reveal the current usage of MDAS.
methodsWeb of Science and Scopus were queried to identify papers that mentioned the use of MDAS.
resultsAmong a total of 260 analyzed papers, 101 papers included comprehensive information regarding both the questions posed and the response format employed. Two papers only used an explicitly renamed MDAS with modified contents. Among the 258 papers that used MDAS that were supposed to be standardized, many discrepancies from the original version were discovered. There were only 39 papers that strictly followed the recommended scoring scheme: if a participant had a score of ≥ 19, he or she might be highly dentally anxious. Notable modifications included the use of a cut-off score different from the original recommendation, the use of multiple cut-off scores, modifications of the response format or descriptors, and modifications to the question items especially adding extra questions.
conclusionsThese modifications would create confusion when researchers and clinicians tried to compare data across studies. Researchers are recommended to administer MDAS in its original format.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.